In a move that has threatened to pit private hospitals against public ones, Gov. Haley Barbour has introduced an assessment on private hospitals effective September 1 to help cover a Medicaid shortfall necessitated by the federal government’s decision to stop Mississippi and other states from using a complex funding formula that has allowed them to receive additional federal money.
Barbour is asking state lawmakers to set aside $45 million to cover half of a $90-million shortfall in state funding for Medicaid, and is using the new hospital assessment — 1.5% on the gross revenues of all hospitals — to help cover the remaining $45 million. (Public hospitals would get back the money sent to the state.) The assessment would make hospitals, already operating with slim profit margins, the only business in the state taxed on gross revenue.
“Let me emphasize that the federal government is mandating this change,” said Barbour, whose actions are receiving much criticism from industry watchers that are calling the assessment nothing more than an unauthorized tax on sick people at a time when the state ended its 2006 budget year June 30 with $70 million in the bank, and months after the governor scoffed at a cigarette tax that would have covered any Medicaid shortfall.
Despite their frustration off-the-record, few private hospital groups have been willing to speak publicly against Barbour’s action, even though they indicate the action may force them to reduce staff, cut back on services and, in some cases, turn away patients who lack insurance. Dale Armour, Mississippi divisional vice president of Naples, Fla.-based Health Management Associates (HMA) Inc. (NYSE: HMA), which operates 11 facilities throughout the state and employs more than 5,500 healthcare professionals, was unavailable to comment on this issue by press time. Mississippi Baptist Health Systems referred the Mississippi Business Journal to a position paper published on July 6 by the Mississippi Hospital Association (MHA).
“It’s taxation without representation, pure and simple,” said MHA president and CEO Sam Cameron. “The hospital gross revenue tax levied by the Division of Medicaid is in violation of the Mississippi Constitution. The statutory authority claimed by the division to levy this tax is an unconstitutional delegation to (Division of Medicaid) of the Legislature’s taxing power. The tax will result in significant financial losses to many of our state’s hospitals and may result in the reduction of needed hospital services in our communities.”
The shortfall was prompted by changes through the inter-governmental transfer (IGT) program that Mississippi used for 14 years, in which Mississippi received a roughly 3-to-1 federal match for Medicaid services, the most generous in the nation. Qualified public providers moved state or local funds to Medicaid to be matched with federal funds. That money, plus extra funds, was transferred back to those providers. Non-public hospitals also benefited from the program because Medicaid had money to fund the program.
For example, a public hospital that contributed $360,000 to the program last year received $500,000 in return as a disproportionate share hospital payment. Additionally, Mississippi recognized $1 million earmarked for the Medicaid program.
Last June, the federal government determined that the method of financing the program to maximize federal matching was unacceptable. State lawmakers knew about this problem during the 2006 legislative session, but postponed taking action while alternative solutions were being sought.
Shortly after the announcement last summer, the Division of Medicaid asked the MHA to contract with Covington & Burling law firm to identify alternates to the IGT funding mechanism. The law firm worked on developing a funding mechanism using certified public expenditures (CPEs), an alternate means of securing federal matching funds that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) had approved in other states.
When Cameron met with Mississippi Medicaid director Robert Robinson May 9, Robinson informed Cameron the CPE program was not the best alternative.
“Instead, they presented their proposal to increase the hospital gross revenue tax by 1% while keeping hospital reimbursement unchanged,” explained Cameron. “Medicaid planned to implement this increased tax on July 1, 2006, and Medicaid asked for MHA’s support of this proposal.”
In late May, MHA told Medicaid the statewide hospital group would not support the increased provider tax but would consider pursuing other options to fund the shortfall, and asked Barbour to delay levying the new tax until September 1.
In a July 6 memorandum to “interested parties,” Barbour explained his decision: “To solve this $90-million problem, the best alternative program will require private hospitals to pay approximately $27.5 million a year for the redistribution of gross revenue assessments. The private hospitals will begin to receive an estimated $20 million in DSH (Disproportionate Share Hospital) payments, and all Medicaid hospital providers will receive higher reimbursement rates on medical service claims beginning in January 2007. As a result of these adjustments, the gross revenue assessment redistribution will not have a negative impact on private hospitals as a whole, although each individual private hospital’s situation will be different. Public hospitals will pay approximately $17.5 million a year for the redistribution of gross revenue assessments compared to the $90 million they paid under the previous system. This proposal will provide significant financial relief to almost all of our small, county-owned public hospitals and to the University Medical Center (UMC).”
Dr. Dan Jones, vice chancellor for health affairs at UMC, has told legislators that the medical center faces nearly $80 million in losses for caring for the uninsured. Nearly 750,000 of the state’s 2.8 million population are enrolled in Medicaid.
After initially sending notices to hospitals with a July 1 effective date to begin collecting the assessment, Barbour agreed to delay the so-called hospital tax until September 1.
“Though appreciated, that still does not change MHA’s position that the gross revenue tax is in violation of the Mississippi Constitution and the statutory authority claimed by the division to levy this tax is an unconstitutional delegation to (Division of Medicaid) of the Legislature’s taxing power. Frighteningly, state officials have also made it clear that they believe they have the authority to raise the tax up to 6% without any legislative involvement.”
“I’m partially relieved from the proposed reduction of funding required from my facility,” said Tim Thomas, administrator for Newton County Hospital. “However, the memo doesn’t provide specific details on the impact to Newton Regional Hospital. I haven’t been given a revised gross revenue assessment rate and implementing parts of the proposal in September and other parts in January make it difficult to estimate.”
Thomas voiced concern about the misunderstanding that government-owned hospitals have been treated inequitably under the IGT program.
“While these hospitals have been contributing a higher proportion of assessments, they’ve also been receiving a higher proportion of distributions,” he explained. “I’m not aware of any concerns being voiced by these hospitals over the assessment formula prior to this issue.”
Thomas also expressed concern about the potential misunderstanding relating to this issue.
“Before this issue, I hadn’t heard of government-owned hospitals being differentiated as ‘high DSH public hospitals,’” he said. “I’m not aware of any discernable differences between a government-owned hospital and a community non-profit hospital in the degree of services provided to underserved populations.
“Most small rural hospitals in Mississippi were originally county-owned facilities constructed under the Hill-Burton Construction program. After the advent of the Medicare DRG payment system in the early 1980’s, many of these county-owned facilities could not be supported by the county governments and were closed or converted to community non-profits. The land and buildings of most of these non-profit hospitals continue to be county-owned.”
Even though state lawmakers could retroactively approve deficit funding for state programs when the next regular session begins in January, there have been rumblings about a special session being called to address this issue. Attorney General Jim Hood is expected to weigh in on the legality of Barbour’s action.
“In the past, we’ve worked in conjunction with the Legislature and Medicaid, to shore the program up,” said Cameron. “Hospitals last year agreed to an additional bed tax so the state would not cut the benefits of Medicaid beneficiaries. But the state cannot continue to balance the Medicaid budget on the backs of hospitals. If this continues, we’ll all see access to care seriously threatened in our state.”
Barbour said he would continue to remain open to other viable alternatives.
“I’ve informed the Mississippi Hospital Association that if they wish to pursue CPEs as a part of the solution, the Division of Medicaid will submit such a plan to CMS for their consideration,” he said.
In the meantime, three dozen hospitals have prepared a lawsuit regarding the constitutionality of the assessment and plan to file it if implemented.
Contact MBJ contributing writer Lynne W. Jeter at Lynne.Jeter@gmail.com.
BEFORE YOU GO…
… we’d like to ask for your support. More people are reading the Mississippi Business Journal than ever before, but advertising revenues for all conventional media are falling fast. Unlike many, we do not use a pay wall, because we want to continue providing Mississippi’s most comprehensive business news each and every day. But that takes time, money and hard work. We do it because it is important to us … and equally important to you, if you value the flow of trustworthy news and information which have always kept America strong and free for more than 200 years.
If those who read our content will help fund it, we can continue to bring you the very best in news and information. Please consider joining us as a valued member, or if you prefer, make a one-time contribution.Click for more info