Home » NEWS » Economic Development » CRAWFORD: Gov. Phil Bryant is no fool

CRAWFORD: Gov. Phil Bryant is no fool

Most politicians know Mr. Pot should think twice before calling Mr. Kettle names.

Oh, they can enthusiastically besmirch each other’s policies and positions, but name calling besmirches the namer more than the named.

So it was in Rep. Steve Holland’s hand written note last week to Gov. Phil Bryant. “I think you’re a fool to turn your back on the working poor,” read the note. Holland’s intent may have been to lambast the Governor’s positions on Medicaid expansion and needs of the working poor, but his words attacked the Governor, not his positions.

The Governor is no fool. He is a well-liked, charismatic, adept politician who takes positions congruent with his record and campaign promises. We are free to disagree with his positions and call his Medicaid position foolish, but it is disingenuous and malicious to call the Governor a fool.

Holland’s note came after the Governor published an op-ed piece defending his Medicaid position. Not many days earlier, Holland wrote an op-ed piece defending PERS, the state retirement system. I think Steve’s position bordered on foolish, but that doesn’t make him a fool. Quite the opposite, he is one of our most opinionated, entertaining, and dedicated legislators. You always know where Steve stands, whether you agree with him or not.

Right now, he should stand up and apologize to the Governor.

Holland’s piece on PERS dealt with the proposal of the PERS Study Commission and Sen. Nancy Collins to add independent members with financial know-how to the PERS Board. As it stands, PERS Board members are people who get, or will get, money from PERS, an apparent conflict of interest.

Holland says this is as it should be. “How many Mississippians, if given a proper choice, would wish to have politicians in charge of their money and their financial future? Does it not seem both fair and equitable for PERS members to elect their own Board of Trustees?”

Holland’s foolish position is that PERS’ money belongs to PERS members so they should control it. Not so. PERS is a publicly funded, state guaranteed, state-owned retirement plan. That’s why taxpayers, not PERS members, have had to bail out PERS since 2006. In 2012 alone, state taxpayers through local and state governments had to ante-up $228 million over and above regular contributions to cover PERS’ shortfalls.

The recommendation to add board members with financial know-how was to try and help the board make better, less risky financial decisions, not politicize the board as Holland argues. Indeed, elected members would still have a majority.

Better PERS decisions would have allowed state and local governments to keep that $228 million bail-out, hold down taxes, and/or fund needed programs…including the Medicaid expansion Holland wants and the Governor says we can’t afford.

No fooling.

» Bill Crawford (crawfolk@gmail.com) is a syndicated columnist from Meridian.


… we’d like to ask for your support. More people are reading the Mississippi Business Journal than ever before, but advertising revenues for all conventional media are falling fast. Unlike many, we do not use a pay wall, because we want to continue providing Mississippi’s most comprehensive business news each and every day. But that takes time, money and hard work. We do it because it is important to us … and equally important to you, if you value the flow of trustworthy news and information which have always kept America strong and free for more than 200 years.

If those who read our content will help fund it, we can continue to bring you the very best in news and information. Please consider joining us as a valued member, or if you prefer, make a one-time contribution.

Click for more info

About Ross Reily

Ross Reily is editor of the Mississippi Business Journal. He is a husband to an amazing wife, dad to 3 crazy kids and 2 dogs. He is also a fan of the Delta State Fighting Okra and the Boston Red Sox.

One comment

  1. Allcost related issues and management decisions,with regards to PERS, must be decided by non-PERS, beneficiary, individuals. That is the only ethical and responsible way to manage the program. I personally am in favor of cancelling the PERS program for future hirees.

    An adjustment in pay can be made so that the employee can establish a private retirement account.

    This wouild remove the financial ambiguity associated with The State maintaining a Pension program.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *