Home » NEWS » Election panel meets in wake of McDaniel-Cochran dispute

Election panel meets in wake of McDaniel-Cochran dispute

Delbert Hosemann

Delbert Hosemann

JACKSON — A 51-person panel convened by Mississippi’s Secretary of State plans to examine possible changes to voting and elections practices.

At its first meeting yesterday, the panel took up one of the most troublesome issues in the aftermath of the Republican primary fight between U.S. Sen Thad Cochran and state Sen. Chris McDaniel: Who should be allowed to vote in party primaries?

The panel, brought together by Delbert Hosemann, heard from Louisiana Secretary of State Tom Schedler, who praised his state’s practice of putting all candidates on one primary ballot regardless of party. There, the top two advance to a runoff, unless one candidate wins a majority in the first round.

That’s unlike Mississippi, where voters must choose one party’s ballot in a primary election, even though they don’t register by party. It’s illegal to vote for one party’s candidates in the first primary then cross over and vote in the other party’s runoff.

Those provisions have been much in dispute following the Cochran-McDaniel runoff. McDaniel’s lawyers have argued that Cochran’s outreach to non-GOP voters was “party raiding” that violated Republicans’ freedom of association.

Also in dispute is a Mississippi law that says voters can be challenged if poll watchers don’t believe they will support the party’s nominees. That law has been declared unenforceable. State Republican Party Chairman Joe Nosef urged the panel to consider a solution to that problem

“To be able to enforce whatever the rules are would be nice, because from a voter’s standpoint, that’s incredibly frustrating.”

Hosemann said he expected that loyalty rule would be one focus of the panel’s work. He also said he would push in the 2015 Legislature to remove voters’ birth dates from poll books, saying they are sensitive information that’s no longer needed now that Mississippi voters must show photo identification before voting.

The Republican secretary of state says the study group will consider other possibilities, such as allowing online voter registration and allowing people to vote before election day for any reason instead of Mississippi’s currently restrictive absentee system.

Louisiana’s system drew some support yesterday from panel members. Carroll County Circuit Clerk Durward Stanton urged panel members to “look at it closely,” saying it would solve the dilemma that voters have in his county, where the most competitive local races involve Democrats, while the most competitive state races involve Republicans.

But big changes, like switching to an all-candidate primary, may not appeal to leaders of Mississippi’s two major parties.

“I think we ought to be careful,” Nosef said. “We shouldn’t have a knee-jerk reaction to our primary and what people think may or may not have happened.”

Mississippi Democratic Party Chairman Rickey Cole said he opposes a Louisiana-style system, but does want a functional way for poll workers to challenge primary voters and favors raising qualifying fees to screen out fringe candidates.

“I think we need to make as modest a number of changes as possible,” Cole said.

 

About Megan Wright

3 comments

  1. Laura Van Overschelde

    Isn’t this interesting? Delbert Hosemann is willing to listen to the political party talking heads for advice on election law changes, but did he invite NON-OFFICE HOLDING CITIZENS?
    BOTH the U. S. Constitution and the Mississippi Constitution ordain such basic foundational law by preambles that say “We, the People”. Is the Secretary now out here in front saying that We, the People should not be consulted on how we select candidates for office, but consult out of State officials to help make those decisions?
    This slaps every interested Mississippi voter in the face!

  2. It does not surprise me the leaders of the states parties would not want to change the system. Any change is good as long as my Bull doesn’t get gored.
    One primary both parties same day. Majority wins PERIOD.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*