NEW ORLEANS — A move by oil giant BP to have a court fire the administrator of a damage claims settlement arising from the 2010 BP oil spill was opposed yesterday by the administrator as well as by lawyers for Gulf Coast interests claiming harm from the disaster.
BP had filed a federal court motion in September saying Patrick Juneau should be removed. Among the reasons: They said Juneau once represented Louisiana in talks setting up the claims process and had pushed for favorable terms for those with claims. According to BP’s motion, Juneau worked for the state from July 2010 until July 21, 2011.
In separate, lengthy rebuttals filed yesterday, plaintiffs’ lawyers and Juneau said BP was aware of Juneau’s prior consultation with Louisiana officials when he was interviewed and nominated for appointment. Juneau said he expressly told BP about his work for the state, and that the work was “widely and publicly known.”
BP has long expressed unhappiness with Juneau’s interpretation of a 2012 claims settlement and is challenging elements of the settlement it once agreed to in court.
The company also has a litany of complaints against Juneau, including the allegation that the claims process lacks transparency and that Juneau spends too much on administration — complaints disputed in yesterday’s filings.
“The Claims Administrator, on his own initiative, obtained an operational audit of the Settlement Program, which concluded that Claims were being processed correctly, transparently and efficiently,” said yesterday’s filing by plaintiff lawyers, headed by Stephen Herman and James Roy.
“Nothing in the briefs submitted by Mr. Juneau or the PSC (plaintiff steering committee) refutes the central fact that Mr. Juneau had an unwaivable conflict that by law should have prevented his appointment as Claims Administrator,” BP spokesman Geoff Morrell said.