Home » NEWS » Supreme Court hear agruments in McDaniel's challenge to Cochran loss (UPDATE)

Supreme Court hear agruments in McDaniel's challenge to Cochran loss (UPDATE)

Chris McDaniel

Chris McDaniel

JACKSON — Attorneys for a tea party-supported candidate are trying to persuade the Mississippi Supreme Court to revive a lawsuit that challenges his Republican primary loss to six-term Sen. Thad Cochran.

But Cochran’s attorneys say state Sen. Chris McDaniel waited too long to try to overturn Cochran’s June 24 victory.

Justices heard nearly two hours of arguments today, but gave no indication of when they will rule.

McDaniel is asking the justices to reinstate a lawsuit a circuit judge dismissed in August. The judge agreed with Cochran’s attorneys, who cited a 1959 state Supreme Court ruling that a candidate must challenge within 20 days. McDaniel waited 41.

McDaniel’s attorneys say state law was rewritten in the 1980s and doesn’t specify a deadline.

McDaniel claims Cochran’s 7,667-vote victory was tainted by voting irregularities.

 

BEFORE YOU GO…

… we’d like to ask for your support. More people are reading the Mississippi Business Journal than ever before, but advertising revenues for all conventional media are falling fast. Unlike many, we do not use a pay wall, because we want to continue providing Mississippi’s most comprehensive business news each and every day. But that takes time, money and hard work. We do it because it is important to us … and equally important to you, if you value the flow of trustworthy news and information which have always kept America strong and free for more than 200 years.

If those who read our content will help fund it, we can continue to bring you the very best in news and information. Please consider joining us as a valued member, or if you prefer, make a one-time contribution.

Click for more info

About Megan Wright

One comment

  1. Chris McDaniel is going correct and should get justice. This reminded me of some of my legal issues which got sorted out with the help of lawyers

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*