Builders oppose new federal bureau
WASHINGTON – Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC) is expressing concern over the creation of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB) that is included in the Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010 (S.3217).
The CFPB would add a new layer of federal bureaucracy to small business lending by establishing additional paperwork and record-keeping requirements, the construction trade association said.
“We do not need more red tape and more federal government regulations,” said 2010 ABC national chairman Jim Elmer, founder and president of James W. Elmer Construction Co., Spokane, Wash. “The majority of U.S. construction firms are small businesses that need unhampered access to capital to fund construction projects and create jobs.
“In order to jump start the lagging economy and put the men and women of the construction industry back to work, ABC calls on Congress and the administration to fo cus on free-enterprise initiatives and open competition instead of creating yet another new federal government agency. With unemployment in the construction industry at nearly 25 percent, creating jobs should be their number one priority.”
In a letter to members of the U.S. Senate, ABC stated, “The construction industry has suffered the most acute impacts of the economic downturn, and access to capital, or the lack thereof, is a major and continuing factor in our industry’s struggles.”
To sign up for Mississippi Business Daily Updates, click here.
Top Posts & Pages
- The Dan Jones-IHL saga: Is this the story that started it all?
- Dan Jones rejects IHL offer, won't publicly apologize
- Email from Nash to Delta Council’s Morgan included in DHA court file
- BREAKING NEWS: Trustees offer new deal to Ole Miss chancellor Dan Jones
- Suit against Kemper employee Brett Wingo is dismissed
- Ole Miss chancellor: Talks continue over job status
- DAVID DALLAS — From Dan and Dixie with love
- Delta Health Alliance CEO Karen Fox under investigation for possible misuse of funds
- Law to bolster utilities’ economic development efforts gets mixed reactions