Toyota: Shutdown of North American factories inevitable

by

Published: April 4,2011

Tags: automobiles, disaster, earthquake, manufacturing, tsunami

LOUISVILLE, Ky. — A Toyota Motor Corp. spokesman says it’s inevitable that the company will have to shut down its North American factories due to shortages of parts from Japan.

Spokesman Mike Goss says the shutdowns are likely to take place later this month, affecting about 25,000 workers. But he says no layoffs are expected.

He says the length of the shutdowns is unknown and depends on how fast earthquake-damaged Japanese parts factories get back in operation.

Toyota gets about 15 percent of its parts from Japan for cars and trucks built in North America.

The company has more than a dozen North American factories.

Goss made the comments today before an appearance in Louisville by Toyota’s head of North American operations.

Source: Associated Press

[RSS Feed] [del.icio.us]



To sign up for Mississippi Business Daily Updates, click here.

One Response to “Toyota: Shutdown of North American factories inevitable”

  1. Rwolf Says:

    If Japan’s damaged nuclear reactors continue to leak radiation into the air and oceans, many industries may be damaged financially by radiation contamination. For example fishing industries. How far will millions of gallons of radioactive water travel that has been dumped from damaged Japanese reactors? Will seafood be contaminated for generations affecting many countries? If Japan’s damaged nuclear reactors continue leaking radiation into the air could that over a period of time cause dangerous levels of radiation to be absorbed by U.S. farm crops and cattle, making U.S. farm foods unmarketable; cause U.S. food shortages and high prices. Could several of Japan’s industrial products become too radioactive to export? So much for clean nuclear energy.

    In the U.S. most nuclear reactors have to be subsidized by taxpayers. When nuclear reactors leak as shown in Japan, it can be hugely expensive; and unaffordable when damaged reactors melt down spreading high levels of radiation. In the U.S. too many nuclear reactors are close to large U.S. populations; 300 miles is close when communities are downwind. In addition to catastrophic health costs, a leaking reactor can contaminate for decades, destroy the value of real estate of entire cities and shutdown industries. The potential risks of building more nuclear reactors and continuing to operate old reactors in the U.S. cannot be justified considering the potential catastrophic downside. The U.S. has approximately 104 nuclear reactors. From a military standpoint, U.S. enemies would need only target U.S. nuclear reactors to spread deadly radiation to large cities crippling America. Nuclear reactors are a losing bet when you consider the downside.

POST A COMMENT

 

FOLLOW THE MBJ ON TWITTER

Top Posts & Pages