<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Officials vote to change airport name again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/10/19/officials-vote-to-change-airport-name-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/10/19/officials-vote-to-change-airport-name-again/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=officials-vote-to-change-airport-name-again</link>
	<description>Mississippi Business Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:34:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJTMJSA</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/10/19/officials-vote-to-change-airport-name-again/#comment-126922</link>
		<dc:creator>RJTMJSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=47355#comment-126922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People need to remember that it is inconvenient for all the travelers who just want to know the name of the Airport as simply as possible to first make their flight plans and then to communicate plans with others.  Every time you have multiple choices pop us as to what airport you are trying to go to, it just makes it harder for the traveler.  Why not instead have big signs in the airport or on the airport grounds with whatever names you want on there and leave the airport name as simple as possible?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People need to remember that it is inconvenient for all the travelers who just want to know the name of the Airport as simply as possible to first make their flight plans and then to communicate plans with others.  Every time you have multiple choices pop us as to what airport you are trying to go to, it just makes it harder for the traveler.  Why not instead have big signs in the airport or on the airport grounds with whatever names you want on there and leave the airport name as simple as possible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmy mortzon</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/10/19/officials-vote-to-change-airport-name-again/#comment-126920</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmy mortzon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=47355#comment-126920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[City officials wonder why people are leaving the city of Jackson... waste of money like this is the reason...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>City officials wonder why people are leaving the city of Jackson&#8230; waste of money like this is the reason&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reba G. Cook</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/10/19/officials-vote-to-change-airport-name-again/#comment-126919</link>
		<dc:creator>Reba G. Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=47355#comment-126919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[$100,000 to be spent on crap such as this? No wonder we&#039;re broke!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$100,000 to be spent on crap such as this? No wonder we&#8217;re broke!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/10/19/officials-vote-to-change-airport-name-again/#comment-126916</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=47355#comment-126916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stupid!  Never should have been changed the first time.  Now again?  What a waste of taxpayers money!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stupid!  Never should have been changed the first time.  Now again?  What a waste of taxpayers money!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
