<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Personhood&#8217; prop splits Mississippi religious leaders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/11/03/personhood-prop-splits-mississippi-religious-leaders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/11/03/personhood-prop-splits-mississippi-religious-leaders/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=personhood-prop-splits-mississippi-religious-leaders</link>
	<description>Mississippi Business Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:29:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt Greiter</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/11/03/personhood-prop-splits-mississippi-religious-leaders/#comment-127237</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Greiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=48019#comment-127237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simple people need simple answers with &quot;zero tolerance&quot; rules to live by.... We&#039;ve got so lazy about actually thinking that we just want someone to give us a dumbed-down rule to follow. The problem is, the answer is just slightly... not grossly... more complicated. I&#039;ll try to simplify it... We all agree that HUMAN life ENDS... yes, that&#039;s right, ENDS... when brain stem activity stops... that person is then declared dead. Knowing this fact, how can HUMAN life begin BEFORE that same brain activity starts? Sure it&#039;s &quot;life&quot; just as any other growing cellular organism is &quot;life&quot;... but it&#039;s not a HUMAN life until the type of brain activity begins that makes us human. Abortion should be ILLEGAL AFTER such brain activity begins [typically around 10-12 weeks] but it should be legal up until that point. There is no Biblical basis for life beginning at conception... so why the need for a dumbed-down, black &amp; white rule to go by? Why can&#039;t we make a simple observation... AND THEN make an intelligent decision based on that data? This is a medical procedure, not a sacrament.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple people need simple answers with &#8220;zero tolerance&#8221; rules to live by&#8230;. We&#8217;ve got so lazy about actually thinking that we just want someone to give us a dumbed-down rule to follow. The problem is, the answer is just slightly&#8230; not grossly&#8230; more complicated. I&#8217;ll try to simplify it&#8230; We all agree that HUMAN life ENDS&#8230; yes, that&#8217;s right, ENDS&#8230; when brain stem activity stops&#8230; that person is then declared dead. Knowing this fact, how can HUMAN life begin BEFORE that same brain activity starts? Sure it&#8217;s &#8220;life&#8221; just as any other growing cellular organism is &#8220;life&#8221;&#8230; but it&#8217;s not a HUMAN life until the type of brain activity begins that makes us human. Abortion should be ILLEGAL AFTER such brain activity begins [typically around 10-12 weeks] but it should be legal up until that point. There is no Biblical basis for life beginning at conception&#8230; so why the need for a dumbed-down, black &amp; white rule to go by? Why can&#8217;t we make a simple observation&#8230; AND THEN make an intelligent decision based on that data? This is a medical procedure, not a sacrament.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Stubbs</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/11/03/personhood-prop-splits-mississippi-religious-leaders/#comment-127207</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Stubbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 12:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=48019#comment-127207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those who oppose the personhood admendment - when did you become a person in your mother&#039;s womb? Was it at the moment of conception or after the heartbeat could be heard? What applies to the unborn applies to you. If you say that the unborn is not a person at conpection, then you were not a person when your parents conceived you. Stop being selfish. You are either on the one side or the other -- when you sit on the fence, you will fall off sooner or later.

May God forgive you if you say NO to the unborn!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who oppose the personhood admendment &#8211; when did you become a person in your mother&#8217;s womb? Was it at the moment of conception or after the heartbeat could be heard? What applies to the unborn applies to you. If you say that the unborn is not a person at conpection, then you were not a person when your parents conceived you. Stop being selfish. You are either on the one side or the other &#8212; when you sit on the fence, you will fall off sooner or later.</p>
<p>May God forgive you if you say NO to the unborn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
