Supreme Court rules Barbour’s last-minute pardons valid
Published: March 8,2012
JACKSON — The Mississippi Supreme Court ruled today that some pardons issued by former Gov. Haley Barbour are valid.
In their 6-3 opinion, the justices wrote “we are compelled to hold that — in each of the cases before us — it fell to the governor alone to decide whether the Constitution’s publication requirement was met.”
Republican Barbour pardoned 198 people before finishing his second term Jan. 10, including four convicted murderers and a robber who worked as inmate trusties at the Governor’s Mansion. Of those pardoned, 10 were in jail at the time.
Democratic Attorney General Jim Hood challenged the pardons. Hood argued before the Supreme Court on Feb. 9 that some pardons didn’t meet the requirements of the Mississippi Constitution, which says people seeking pardons must publish notices for 30 days in a newspaper.
Hood had contended the trusties and about 165 others didn’t meet that requirement.
Barbour’s lawyer and the attorneys representing some of the pardon recipients had argued that a Mississippi governor’s pardon power can’t be challenged because of the separation of powers for different branches of government.
The 10 people who were incarcerated when Barbour pardoned them had the most at stake in the legal challenge. Among those 10, five pardoned inmates have been held in prison on a temporary restraining order pending the outcome of Hood’s legal challenge. The five former Governor’s Mansion trusties had already been released by the time Hood persuaded a lower court judge to issue that restraining order.
The restraining order required the trusties to check in with corrections officials every 24 hours and show up for court hearings. One of the trusties, however, moved to Laramie, Wyo., and refused to come back. Hood’s investigators tracked him down in Wyoming, but could only serve him with the civil summons. The civil summons could not be used to compel the inmate to return to Mississippi from another state.
At the heart of the pardon dispute was Section 124 of the Mississippi Constitution, which says “no pardon shall be granted” by the governor until the convicted felon applying for the pardon publishes notice of that application for 30 days in a newspaper in or near the county where the crime was committed.
Hood contended that if ads weren’t run in daily papers every day for 30 days, or weekly newspapers once a week for five weeks, the pardons weren’t valid.
Barbour, who once considered a 2012 White House run, was limited to two terms as governor. In addition to the 198 pardons issued in his final days in office, he also granted medical release and conditional clemency to some inmates, but they weren’t required to give public notice of their release.
The arguments before the Mississippi Supreme Court earlier this month concentrated on the 10 inmates who were in custody when pardoned. However, they’re not the only ones affected. Those who received pardons after being out of prison for years, some for relatively minor crimes, could lose their chance to have their rights restored, including their rights to vote and to buy firearms.
To sign up for Mississippi Business Daily Updates, click here.
Top Posts & Pages
- Host families prepare for Mississippi Braves’ season
- Ridgeland property rights tussle is expected to have wide impact
- JOSH MABUS — Mississippi’s Healthcare: Not a quality problem, a marketing problem
- HUNTER ARNOLD: Mississippi, Gulf Coast states focus on global business markets
- Mississippi takes an incentives licking, keeps on ticking
- Investors in Northbrook complex say Ridgeland targeting its own collateral for demolition
- AWAITING ITS FATE: Gables complex may have to shrink to meet law
- PHIL HARDWICK: When will Mississippi change its culture?
- Mississippi furniture makers on rebound with more exports