<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mississippi Business Journal &#187; constitutionality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/tag/constitutionality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://msbusiness.com</link>
	<description>Mississippi Business Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:27:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Damages cap ruling could invite another challenge</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/08/damages-cap-ruling-could-invite-another-challenge/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=damages-cap-ruling-could-invite-another-challenge</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/08/damages-cap-ruling-could-invite-another-challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 16:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clay Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MBJ FEATURE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Learmouth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=71277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in late February that Mississippi’s $1 million cap on non-economic damages arising from civil litigation does not violate the state constitution’s separation of powers clause. The appeals court issued the ruling in response to the Mississippi Supreme Court’s decision not to rule on the matter last summer. The [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/08/damages-cap-ruling-could-invite-another-challenge/">Damages cap ruling could invite another challenge</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/08/damages-cap-ruling-could-invite-another-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Department gives OK to redistricting plan</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/12/18/justice-department-gives-ok-to-redistricting-plan/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=justice-department-gives-ok-to-redistricting-plan</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/12/18/justice-department-gives-ok-to-redistricting-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[candidate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public official]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redistrictricting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=67020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — The Department of Justice has pre-cleared the city of Jackson&#8217;s redistricting plan, clearing the way for City Council members to run under new ward lines in 2013. The Clarion-Ledger reports the new lines keep roughly the same structure as the old, with each ward seeing minor changes to account for a shrinking city [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/12/18/justice-department-gives-ok-to-redistricting-plan/">Justice Department gives OK to redistricting plan</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/12/18/justice-department-gives-ok-to-redistricting-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tort reform case will probably have to wait until 2013</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/11/13/tort-reform-case-will-probably-have-to-wait-until-2013/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tort-reform-case-will-probably-have-to-wait-until-2013</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/11/13/tort-reform-case-will-probably-have-to-wait-until-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=65293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — Resolution of a long-running Mississippi personal injury lawsuit that challenges the constitutionality of a portion of the state&#8217;s tort laws is not expected before next year. The lawsuit, first filed in the federal court in 2006, contends Mississippi&#8217;s $1 million cap on non-economic damages is unfair. The cap was put into place a [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/11/13/tort-reform-case-will-probably-have-to-wait-until-2013/">Tort reform case will probably have to wait until 2013</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/11/13/tort-reform-case-will-probably-have-to-wait-until-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hosemann to Justice: People have spoken on voter ID</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/10/03/hosemann-to-justice-people-have-spoken-on-voter-id/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hosemann-to-justice-people-have-spoken-on-voter-id</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/10/03/hosemann-to-justice-people-have-spoken-on-voter-id/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 11:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=63425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — In response to the Department of Justice’s request for more information about the new state voter identification law, Secretary of State Delbert Hosemann says the people of Mississippi have already spoken to whether the law is discriminatory or not. In a statement, Hosemann said: “The Department of Justice has requested information from the [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/10/03/hosemann-to-justice-people-have-spoken-on-voter-id/">Hosemann to Justice: People have spoken on voter ID</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/10/03/hosemann-to-justice-people-have-spoken-on-voter-id/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senators file amicus brief challenging health care reform</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/15/senators-file-amicus-brief-challenging-health-care-reform/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=senators-file-amicus-brief-challenging-health-care-reform</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/15/senators-file-amicus-brief-challenging-health-care-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MBJ Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HEALTH CARE - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[helath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislative branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=52446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON — U.S. Senators Thad Cochran (R-Miss.) and Roger Wicker (R-Miss) are among 43 Senators who have filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in support of a multi-state legal challenge to a federal mandate that individuals must purchase health insurance. The amicus brief was filed with the Supreme Court Monday in support [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/15/senators-file-amicus-brief-challenging-health-care-reform/">Senators file amicus brief challenging health care reform</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/15/senators-file-amicus-brief-challenging-health-care-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court to hear arguments over Barbour&#8217;s pardons</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/08/supreme-court-to-hear-arguments-over-barbours-pardons/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=supreme-court-to-hear-arguments-over-barbours-pardons</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/08/supreme-court-to-hear-arguments-over-barbours-pardons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[convicts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eexecutive branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pardons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prisons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[separation of power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trusties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=52075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — The freedom of 10 people is at stake and dozens of others could lose their hopes for a cleansed record in the legal battle over former Gov. Haley Barbour&#8217;s pardons. The Mississippi Supreme Court will hear arguments in the case tomorrow. Five inmates remain jailed because Attorney General Jim Hood persuaded a judge [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/08/supreme-court-to-hear-arguments-over-barbours-pardons/">Supreme Court to hear arguments over Barbour&#8217;s pardons</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/08/supreme-court-to-hear-arguments-over-barbours-pardons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legislators seem unconcerned about growing tort reform cases</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/01/30/legislators-seem-unconcerned-about-growing-tort-reform-cases/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=legislators-seem-unconcerned-about-growing-tort-reform-cases</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/01/30/legislators-seem-unconcerned-about-growing-tort-reform-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal injuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=51191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — As the number of tort reform cases before the Mississippi Supreme Court keeps growing, state lawmakers don&#8217;t seem quite as concerned about the court&#8217;s rulings as are Mississippi&#8217;s legal and corporate communities. The deadline to file bills for consideration in the Legislature&#8217;s 2012 session is Feb. 20. That&#8217;s plenty of time to get [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/01/30/legislators-seem-unconcerned-about-growing-tort-reform-cases/">Legislators seem unconcerned about growing tort reform cases</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/01/30/legislators-seem-unconcerned-about-growing-tort-reform-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
