<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mississippi Business Journal &#187; earmarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/tag/earmarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://msbusiness.com</link>
	<description>Mississippi Business Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:16:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>August 6, 2012- Ricky Nobile</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/08/05/august-6-2012-ricky-nobile/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=august-6-2012-ricky-nobile</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/08/05/august-6-2012-ricky-nobile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 06:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Nobile</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CARTOONS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military bases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Legislature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=60624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/08/05/august-6-2012-ricky-nobile/">August 6, 2012- Ricky Nobile</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/08/05/august-6-2012-ricky-nobile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Earmark moratorium could impact railroad project</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/02/02/earmark-moratorium-could-impact-railroad-project/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=earmark-moratorium-could-impact-railroad-project</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/02/02/earmark-moratorium-could-impact-railroad-project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[railroads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=36379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>PASCAGOULA — The Rail Authority of East Mississippi has $1 million in a congressional appropriation for the proposed rail link from Waynesboro to Lucedale, but there is a problem, according to the authority&#8217;s executive director. &#8220;This would be one of those nasty old &#8216;earmarks&#8217; that everybody talks about that really aren&#8217;t as bad as people [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/02/02/earmark-moratorium-could-impact-railroad-project/">Earmark moratorium could impact railroad project</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/02/02/earmark-moratorium-could-impact-railroad-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LaForge issues statement on earkmark debate</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/11/17/laforge-issues-statement-on-earkmark-debate/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=laforge-issues-statement-on-earkmark-debate</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/11/17/laforge-issues-statement-on-earkmark-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ross Reily</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BANKING & FINANCE - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill LaForge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/2010/11/laforge-issues-statement-on-earkmark-debate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Cleveland native Bill LaForge, a past national president of the Federal Bar Association, has issued a statement on the topic of earmarks that has become a national issue and rallying cry in the recent national elections. LaForge calls the efforts to eliminate earmarks as “shortsighted”, giving all of the budgeting power to the executive branch. [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/11/17/laforge-issues-statement-on-earkmark-debate/">LaForge issues statement on earkmark debate</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/11/17/laforge-issues-statement-on-earkmark-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wicker, Cochran vote against earmarks</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/11/17/wicker-cochran-vote-against-earmarks/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=wicker-cochran-vote-against-earmarks</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/11/17/wicker-cochran-vote-against-earmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wally Northway</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earmarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=33387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON — Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and Sen. Thad Cochran (R-Miss.) have thrown their support to a resolution in the Republican Conference to place a moratorium on earmarks in the 112th Congress. &#8220;I will vote for the proposed moratorium on earmarks,&#8221; Wicker said. &#8220;During my time in public service, I have made it a priority [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/11/17/wicker-cochran-vote-against-earmarks/">Wicker, Cochran vote against earmarks</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/11/17/wicker-cochran-vote-against-earmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cochran opposes earmark moratorium</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/03/17/cochran-opposes-earmark-moratorium/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cochran-opposes-earmark-moratorium</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/03/17/cochran-opposes-earmark-moratorium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wally Northway</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National/International News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cochran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earmarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=20832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON — Sen. Thad Cochran (R-Miss.), vice chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, has come out strongly against a proposal that he says would effectively impose a moratorium on how Congress uses earmarks to appropriate funding for programs and projects within the federal government. The Senate on Tuesday voted with Cochran (68-29) to table an [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/03/17/cochran-opposes-earmark-moratorium/">Cochran opposes earmark moratorium</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/03/17/cochran-opposes-earmark-moratorium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawmakers vow to end corporate earmarks</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/03/10/lawmakers-vow-to-end-corporate-earmarks/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=lawmakers-vow-to-end-corporate-earmarks</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/03/10/lawmakers-vow-to-end-corporate-earmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National/International News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate earmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earmarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=20458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON — House Democratic leaders announced today that they will ban the much-criticized practice of using annual spending bills to direct pet projects to for-profit companies that often return the favor with campaign contributions. House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey, D-Wis., told reporters that he hopes the step will mean 1,000 fewer earmarks and break [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/03/10/lawmakers-vow-to-end-corporate-earmarks/">Lawmakers vow to end corporate earmarks</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/03/10/lawmakers-vow-to-end-corporate-earmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
