<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mississippi Business Journal &#187; employee benefits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/tag/employee-benefits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://msbusiness.com</link>
	<description>Mississippi Business Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:01:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Capital City&#8217;s pension plan one of worst in U.S.</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/01/17/study-capital-citys-pension-plan-one-of-worst-in-u-s/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=study-capital-citys-pension-plan-one-of-worst-in-u-s</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/01/17/study-capital-citys-pension-plan-one-of-worst-in-u-s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MBJ Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[municipal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[municipality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retiree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shortfall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=68313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — Sixty-one key cities across America, including Jackson, have emerged from the Great Recession with a gap of more than $217 billion between what they had promised their workers in pensions and retiree health care and what they had saved to pay that bill, according to a report released by The Pew Charitable Trusts. The [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/01/17/study-capital-citys-pension-plan-one-of-worst-in-u-s/">Study: Capital City&#8217;s pension plan one of worst in U.S.</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/01/17/study-capital-citys-pension-plan-one-of-worst-in-u-s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health insurance costs exceed $2 per hour</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/06/15/health-insurance-costs-exceed-2-per-hour/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=health-insurance-costs-exceed-2-per-hour</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/06/15/health-insurance-costs-exceed-2-per-hour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wally Northway</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HEALTH CARE - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National/International News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=25536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In March 2010, the average cost for health insurance benefits was $2.08 per hour worked in private industry. Among occupational groups, employer costs for health insurance benefits ranged from 92 cents per hour for service workers, to $3.03 per hour for management, professional, and related occupations. In March 2010, among other occupational groups, employer costs [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/06/15/health-insurance-costs-exceed-2-per-hour/">Health insurance costs exceed $2 per hour</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/06/15/health-insurance-costs-exceed-2-per-hour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Workers oppose benefits reduction</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/04/14/workers-oppose-benefits-reduction/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=workers-oppose-benefits-reduction</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/04/14/workers-oppose-benefits-reduction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=22313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>BILOXI — Employees have asked the Biloxi Council to look for other ways to cut costs before they reduce employee benefits. The administration has proposed rolling back longevity pay from $15 a month per year to $6 and requiring employees to contribute $200 a month for families and $100 for singles toward their health insurance. [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/04/14/workers-oppose-benefits-reduction/">Workers oppose benefits reduction</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/04/14/workers-oppose-benefits-reduction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T workers vote on striking</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/04/08/att-workers-vote-on-striking/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=att-workers-vote-on-striking</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/04/08/att-workers-vote-on-striking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 14:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National/International News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=21996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>SOUTH MISSISSIPPI — Union workers at AT&#38;T Mobility in South Mississippi have voted on whether to strike as part of an effort to get an in increase wages and benefits. Eric Cox, treasurer for the Communications Workers of America Local 3519, said the company&#8217;s 400 employees are in contract negotiations. The workers, who handle customer [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/04/08/att-workers-vote-on-striking/">AT&amp;T workers vote on striking</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/04/08/att-workers-vote-on-striking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UAW suing GM over retirement benefits</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/04/07/uaw-suing-gm-over-retirement-benefits/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=uaw-suing-gm-over-retirement-benefits</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/04/07/uaw-suing-gm-over-retirement-benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 11:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National/International News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=21932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>DETROIT — The United Auto Workers union has sued General Motors Corp., saying the automaker owes it $450 million for retiree health care. In the lawsuit filed yesterday in federal court in Detroit, the UAW said that in 2007, GM agreed to pay $450 million to settle a UAW claim against auto supplier Delphi Corp. [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/04/07/uaw-suing-gm-over-retirement-benefits/">UAW suing GM over retirement benefits</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/04/07/uaw-suing-gm-over-retirement-benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Average compensation costs exceed $27 per hour</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/03/12/average-compensation-costs-exceed-27-per-hour/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=average-compensation-costs-exceed-27-per-hour</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/03/12/average-compensation-costs-exceed-27-per-hour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wally Northway</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National/International News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wages and salaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=20561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Private industry employers spent an average of $27.42 per hour worked for total employee compensation in Dec. 2009, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports. Wages and salaries averaged $19.41 per hour worked and accounted for 70.8 percent of these costs, while benefits averaged $8.00 and accounted for the remaining 29.2 percent. Total compensation costs [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/03/12/average-compensation-costs-exceed-27-per-hour/">Average compensation costs exceed $27 per hour</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2010/03/12/average-compensation-costs-exceed-27-per-hour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employer cost survey released</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2009/09/14/employer-cost-survey-released/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=employer-cost-survey-released</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2009/09/14/employer-cost-survey-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wally Northway</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MANUFACTURING/PRIVATE COMPANIES - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal agency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=12482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Employers spent an average of $1.29 for employee retirement and savings plans for every hour worked in June 2009, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports. This accounted for 4.4 percent of total compensation. Total compensation (wages and salaries and benefits) for civilian workers averaged $29.31 per hour worked in June 2009. Wages and salaries, which [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2009/09/14/employer-cost-survey-released/">Employer cost survey released</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2009/09/14/employer-cost-survey-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pratt earns CBP designation</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2009/08/17/pratt-earns-cbp-designation/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=pratt-earns-cbp-designation</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2009/08/17/pratt-earns-cbp-designation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MBJ Newswires</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlotte Pratt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi State University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Mississippi Health Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=11087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Charlotte Pratt, benefit services coordinator for North Mississippi Health Services, has earned the Certified Benefits Professional (CBP) designation from WorldatWork Society of Certified Professionals. With 10 years of benefits experience, Pratt is responsible for coordinating employee benefit programs for employees, including plan compliance, education and enrollment. A member of the local chapter of Northeast Mississippi [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2009/08/17/pratt-earns-cbp-designation/">Pratt earns CBP designation</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2009/08/17/pratt-earns-cbp-designation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
