<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mississippi Business Journal &#187; family planning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/tag/family-planning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://msbusiness.com</link>
	<description>Mississippi Business Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:01:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Personhood opponents angry over new life-at-conception bill</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/02/personhood-opponents-angry-over-new-life-at-conception-bill/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=personhood-opponents-angry-over-new-life-at-conception-bill</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/02/personhood-opponents-angry-over-new-life-at-conception-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HEALTH CARE - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[births]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraceptives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections. votes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislative branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=53394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — Opponents say they are angry that Mississippi lawmakers are considering proposals to declare life begins at conception, months after voters rejected a similar constitutional amendment. Several bills would also put new restrictions on abortion in a state that already requires a 24-hour waiting period before any abortion can be performed and parental consent [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/02/personhood-opponents-angry-over-new-life-at-conception-bill/">Personhood opponents angry over new life-at-conception bill</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/02/personhood-opponents-angry-over-new-life-at-conception-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
