<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mississippi Business Journal &#187; federal law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/tag/federal-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://msbusiness.com</link>
	<description>Mississippi Business Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:30:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Court hears debate over pre-clearance section of Voting Rights Act</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/02/27/court-hears-debate-over-pre-clearance-section-of-voting-rights-act/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=court-hears-debate-over-pre-clearance-section-of-voting-rights-act</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/02/27/court-hears-debate-over-pre-clearance-section-of-voting-rights-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-clearance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting right]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=70433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court is wrestling with the fate of a section of a landmark civil rights law that has helped millions of Americans exercise their right to vote. In an argument at the court, liberal and conservative justices engaged in a sometimes tense back and forth over whether there is an ongoing need [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/02/27/court-hears-debate-over-pre-clearance-section-of-voting-rights-act/">Court hears debate over pre-clearance section of Voting Rights Act</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/02/27/court-hears-debate-over-pre-clearance-section-of-voting-rights-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>City faces retroactive fines for Clean Water Act violations</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/02/21/city-faces-retroactive-fines-for-clean-water-act-violations/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=city-faces-retroactive-fines-for-clean-water-act-violations</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/02/21/city-faces-retroactive-fines-for-clean-water-act-violations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecosystem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[municipal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[municipality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wadstewater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildlife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=70125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>STARKVILLE — The city of Starkville faces retroactive fines due to past overflow incidents involving its sanitary sewage system. The Commercial Dispatch reports public works director Doug Devlin did not have a fine estimate for aldermen, but did say a scheduled March conference call with Environmental Protection Agency regulators could shed light on the penalties [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/02/21/city-faces-retroactive-fines-for-clean-water-act-violations/">City faces retroactive fines for Clean Water Act violations</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/02/21/city-faces-retroactive-fines-for-clean-water-act-violations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal law-nullification bill killed by committee chair</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/02/05/federal-law-nullification-bill-killed-by-committee-chair/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=federal-law-nullification-bill-killed-by-committee-chair</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/02/05/federal-law-nullification-bill-killed-by-committee-chair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawmaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nullification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nullify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seccession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=69276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON &#8212; Mississippi, a state that defied federal authority during the Civil War and the civil rights movement, won&#8217;t revive its efforts to nullify federal laws — at least not this year. Republican Scott DeLano, of Biloxi, chairman of the state House Constitution Committee, has killed a bill that sought to neutralize federal laws that [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/02/05/federal-law-nullification-bill-killed-by-committee-chair/">Federal law-nullification bill killed by committee chair</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/02/05/federal-law-nullification-bill-killed-by-committee-chair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State lawmakers file bill to nullify federal law</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/01/25/state-lawmakers-file-bill-to-nullify-federal-law/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=state-lawmakers-file-bill-to-nullify-federal-law</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/01/25/state-lawmakers-file-bill-to-nullify-federal-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawmaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nullification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seccession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=68705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — Mississippi defied the union during the Civil War and civil rights era, and at least two lawmakers think it is time to do so again. Republican state Reps. Gary Chism and Jeff Smith, both of Columbus, filed a bill this month to form the Joint Legislative Committee on the Neutralization of Federal Laws. [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/01/25/state-lawmakers-file-bill-to-nullify-federal-law/">State lawmakers file bill to nullify federal law</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/01/25/state-lawmakers-file-bill-to-nullify-federal-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal appeals panel to weigh LCD price-fixing lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/09/24/federal-appeals-panel-to-weigh-lcd-price-fixing-lawsuit/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=federal-appeals-panel-to-weigh-lcd-price-fixing-lawsuit</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/09/24/federal-appeals-panel-to-weigh-lcd-price-fixing-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MANUFACTURING/PRIVATE COMPANIES - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fabricate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fabricating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fabrication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price fixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplier]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=63051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>NEW ORLEANS — A federal appeals panel will decide whether a Mississippi or federal court has jurisdiction over a lawsuit alleging price fixing by manufacturers of liquid crystal display screens. A panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has scheduled oral argument in New Orleans for Oct. 5. Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/09/24/federal-appeals-panel-to-weigh-lcd-price-fixing-lawsuit/">Federal appeals panel to weigh LCD price-fixing lawsuit</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/09/24/federal-appeals-panel-to-weigh-lcd-price-fixing-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entergy: Grand Gulf license renewal remains on track</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/06/25/entergy-grand-gulf-license-renewal-remains-on-track/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=entergy-grand-gulf-license-renewal-remains-on-track</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/06/25/entergy-grand-gulf-license-renewal-remains-on-track/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 16:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENERGY - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elecvtric generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=59032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>CLAIBORNE COUNTY — Entergy Nuclear officials say the license renewal for the Grand Gulf Nuclear Power Plant in Claiborne County remains on track. Grand Gulf&#8217;s license expires in 2024, and an application to extend it an additional 20 years is expected to be finalized by September 2013. On June 8, the U.S. Court of Appeals [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/06/25/entergy-grand-gulf-license-renewal-remains-on-track/">Entergy: Grand Gulf license renewal remains on track</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/06/25/entergy-grand-gulf-license-renewal-remains-on-track/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PSC, FTC put robocaller out of telemarketing business</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/24/psc-ftc-put-robocaller-out-of-telemarketing-business/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=psc-ftc-put-robocaller-out-of-telemarketing-business</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/24/psc-ftc-put-robocaller-out-of-telemarketing-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MBJ Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TECHNOLOGY & TELECOM - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Call]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promotions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telemarketers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telemarketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=56119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — The Mississippi Public Service Commission (PSC) along with the Federal Trade Commission have exchanged information and put a robocaller out of the telemarketing business, according to Public Service Commissioner Brandon Presley. The telemarketers were allegedly responsible for billions of calls and will give up assets totaling roughly $3 million under an FTC order. [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/24/psc-ftc-put-robocaller-out-of-telemarketing-business/">PSC, FTC put robocaller out of telemarketing business</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/24/psc-ftc-put-robocaller-out-of-telemarketing-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
