<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mississippi Business Journal &#187; judicial branch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/tag/judicial-branch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://msbusiness.com</link>
	<description>Mississippi Business Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:01:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>State House passes judicial pay raise legislation</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/08/state-house-passes-judicial-pay-raise-legislation/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=state-house-passes-judicial-pay-raise-legislation</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/08/state-house-passes-judicial-pay-raise-legislation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 16:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=53685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — Judges and prosecutors would get pay raises over four years, under a plan the Mississippi House passed yesterday. Mississippi&#8217;s circuit and chancery judges currently make $104,000 a year. The bill would increase their pay in four annual steps to $136,000 a year by 2016. Pay would also increase for district attorneys, appellate judges [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/08/state-house-passes-judicial-pay-raise-legislation/">State House passes judicial pay raise legislation</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/08/state-house-passes-judicial-pay-raise-legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senators file amicus brief challenging health care reform</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/15/senators-file-amicus-brief-challenging-health-care-reform/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=senators-file-amicus-brief-challenging-health-care-reform</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/15/senators-file-amicus-brief-challenging-health-care-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MBJ Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HEALTH CARE - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[helath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislative branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=52446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON — U.S. Senators Thad Cochran (R-Miss.) and Roger Wicker (R-Miss) are among 43 Senators who have filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in support of a multi-state legal challenge to a federal mandate that individuals must purchase health insurance. The amicus brief was filed with the Supreme Court Monday in support [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/15/senators-file-amicus-brief-challenging-health-care-reform/">Senators file amicus brief challenging health care reform</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/15/senators-file-amicus-brief-challenging-health-care-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawyers appeal fraud verdict in asbestos lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/13/lawyers-appeals-fraud-verdict-in-asbestos-lawsuit/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=lawyers-appeals-fraud-verdict-in-asbestos-lawsuit</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/13/lawyers-appeals-fraud-verdict-in-asbestos-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rail lines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[railroads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[railways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=52361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>HOUSTON, Texas — Two Mississippi plaintiffs lawyers, including a former state lawmaker, have appealed a verdict that they committed fraud during an asbestos lawsuit they filed in 2001. A federal jury in Mississippi decided in 2010 that the lawyers should pay Illinois Central Railroad Company $420,000 in damages. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/13/lawyers-appeals-fraud-verdict-in-asbestos-lawsuit/">Lawyers appeal fraud verdict in asbestos lawsuit</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/13/lawyers-appeals-fraud-verdict-in-asbestos-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judicial panel does not rule on Yazoo Pump controversy</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/10/judicial-panel-does-not-rule-on-yazoo-pump-controversy/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=judicial-panel-does-not-rule-on-yazoo-pump-controversy</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/10/judicial-panel-does-not-rule-on-yazoo-pump-controversy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AGRICULTURE - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farmers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flood control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flooding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habitat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildlife habitat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=52262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>MISSISSIPPI DELTA — A Mississippi levee board asked a federal appeals court yesterday to revive a $220 million Yazoo River flood control project that was vetoed by the Environmental Protection Agency in 2008 over concerns that it would harm wetlands and wildlife. A three-judge panel from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/10/judicial-panel-does-not-rule-on-yazoo-pump-controversy/">Judicial panel does not rule on Yazoo Pump controversy</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/10/judicial-panel-does-not-rule-on-yazoo-pump-controversy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
