<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mississippi Business Journal &#187; justices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/tag/justices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://msbusiness.com</link>
	<description>Mississippi Business Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:16:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Court: Fees paid to private lawyers to represent state are public funds</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/05/25/court-fees-paid-to-private-lawyers-to-represent-state-are-public-funds/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=court-fees-paid-to-private-lawyers-to-represent-state-are-public-funds</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/05/25/court-fees-paid-to-private-lawyers-to-represent-state-are-public-funds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxpayers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=57673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — The Mississippi Supreme Court ruled yesterday in two cases that legal fees paid to private lawyers to represent the state are public funds. Justices said because the money belongs to the public, it should&#8217;ve been paid out to the lawyers from the attorney general&#8217;s contingent fund or from other money appropriated to the [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/05/25/court-fees-paid-to-private-lawyers-to-represent-state-are-public-funds/">Court: Fees paid to private lawyers to represent state are public funds</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/05/25/court-fees-paid-to-private-lawyers-to-represent-state-are-public-funds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court asked to rule in dispute between circuit judges</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/05/14/supreme-court-asked-to-rule-in-dispute-between-circuit-judges/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=supreme-court-asked-to-rule-in-dispute-between-circuit-judges</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/05/14/supreme-court-asked-to-rule-in-dispute-between-circuit-judges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 17:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assignments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciaary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=57083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — The state Supreme Court has been asked to settle a dispute between two Hinds County circuit judges. The issue is the assignment of cases in the county&#8217;s judicial system. The Clarion-Ledger reports Senior Circuit Judge Tomie Green has ordered that beginning Aug. 1 two of the four circuit judges will handle only criminal [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/05/14/supreme-court-asked-to-rule-in-dispute-between-circuit-judges/">Supreme Court asked to rule in dispute between circuit judges</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/05/14/supreme-court-asked-to-rule-in-dispute-between-circuit-judges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regulators meeting now to consider Kemper coal plant construction</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/29/regulators-to-meet-tomorrow-to-consider-kemper-coal-plant-construction/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=regulators-to-meet-tomorrow-to-consider-kemper-coal-plant-construction</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/29/regulators-to-meet-tomorrow-to-consider-kemper-coal-plant-construction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENERGY - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state agency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=54980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — State utility regulators are in session now (Friday) in Jackson to consider issuing a temporary certificate sought by Mississippi Power Co. to continue work at its Kemper County coal-fired power plant. They began at 9 a.m. The Mississippi Supreme Court ruled March 15 that the Public Service Commission failed to lay out its [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/29/regulators-to-meet-tomorrow-to-consider-kemper-coal-plant-construction/">Regulators meeting now to consider Kemper coal plant construction</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/29/regulators-to-meet-tomorrow-to-consider-kemper-coal-plant-construction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court cancels oral arguments on city&#8217;s proposed annexation</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/26/court-cancels-oral-arguments-on-citys-proposed-annexation/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=court-cancels-oral-arguments-on-citys-proposed-annexation</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/26/court-cancels-oral-arguments-on-citys-proposed-annexation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REAL ESTATE - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annexation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[municipal government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=54752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>TUPELO — The Mississippi Supreme Court has canceled oral arguments scheduled for April 10 on the city of Tupelo&#8217;s annexation case. The Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal reports the decision means the justices won&#8217;t hear live testimony from attorneys on either side of the issue but will rule entirely on written briefs. Earlier, Tupelo had opposed [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/26/court-cancels-oral-arguments-on-citys-proposed-annexation/">Court cancels oral arguments on city&#8217;s proposed annexation</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/26/court-cancels-oral-arguments-on-citys-proposed-annexation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court denies motion to reconsider wind-versus-water decision</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/26/court-denies-motion-to-reconsider-wind-versus-water-decision/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=court-denies-motion-to-reconsider-wind-versus-water-decision</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/26/court-denies-motion-to-reconsider-wind-versus-water-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REAL ESTATE - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disaster recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flooding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeowners insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[houses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hurricanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[l homeowners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[severe weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tropical weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=54723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — The Mississippi Supreme Court has denied motions to reconsider its ruling last December that overturned a judgment for an insurance company in a wind vs. water case. The case involved a Pascagoula home hit by 6.3 feet of storm surge during Hurricane Katrina in 2005. Both the homeowners and Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/26/court-denies-motion-to-reconsider-wind-versus-water-decision/">Court denies motion to reconsider wind-versus-water decision</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/26/court-denies-motion-to-reconsider-wind-versus-water-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Presley supports Supreme Court&#8217;s reversal on Kemper power plant</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/19/presley-supports-supreme-courts-reversal-on-kemper-power-plant/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=presley-supports-supreme-courts-reversal-on-kemper-power-plant</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/19/presley-supports-supreme-courts-reversal-on-kemper-power-plant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MBJ Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENERGY - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratepayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=54314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>KEMPER COUNTY — Public Service Commissioner Brandon Presley has issued the following statement in response to the Supreme Court&#8217;s reversal of Mississippi Power Company&#8217;s Kemper County Coal Plant: “(This) 9-0 decision by the Mississippi Supreme Court reversing the $2.8 billion Kemper County Coal Plant is a major victory for each and every customer of Mississippi Power [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/19/presley-supports-supreme-courts-reversal-on-kemper-power-plant/">Presley supports Supreme Court&#8217;s reversal on Kemper power plant</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/19/presley-supports-supreme-courts-reversal-on-kemper-power-plant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court mulls certificates of need — again</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/12/supreme-court-mulls-certificates-of-need-%e2%80%94-again/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=supreme-court-mulls-certificates-of-need-%25e2%2580%2594-again</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/12/supreme-court-mulls-certificates-of-need-%e2%80%94-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HEALTH CARE - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certificate of need]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospitals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=53837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — Mississippi&#8217;s certificate-of-need law, which limits where hospitals can locate and expand and what services they can provide, is back before the state Supreme Court. From its inception by the federal government in 1974, the CON program has led to Herculean legal battles, most of them among Mississippi&#8217;s largest hospitals. Congress created the CON [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/12/supreme-court-mulls-certificates-of-need-%e2%80%94-again/">Supreme Court mulls certificates of need — again</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/12/supreme-court-mulls-certificates-of-need-%e2%80%94-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court to hear arguments in breach of contract dispute</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/01/03/supreme-court-to-hear-arguments-in-breach-of-contract-dispute/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=supreme-court-to-hear-arguments-in-breach-of-contract-dispute</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/01/03/supreme-court-to-hear-arguments-in-breach-of-contract-dispute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENERGY - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petroleum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=50215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>LINCOLN COUNTY — The Mississippi Supreme Court has scheduled oral arguments of Jan. 18 in a commercial breach of contract case from Lincoln County. According to court records, Precision Welding sued Denbury Resources for allegedly breaching a contract between the two. Denbury denied the allegation. A Lincoln County jury in 2010 awarded $1.5 million to [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/01/03/supreme-court-to-hear-arguments-in-breach-of-contract-dispute/">Supreme Court to hear arguments in breach of contract dispute</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/01/03/supreme-court-to-hear-arguments-in-breach-of-contract-dispute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carlson will not seek re-election to Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/11/15/carlson-will-not-seek-re-election-to-supreme-court/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=carlson-will-not-seek-re-election-to-supreme-court</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/11/15/carlson-will-not-seek-re-election-to-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[votes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=48564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>BATESVILLE — Mississippi Supreme Court Presiding Justice George C. Carlson Jr. of Batesville plans to retire at the end of his term in January 2013. He will complete the term, but will not seek reelection in November 2012. Justice Carlson, 65, will have completed 30 years of public service as a judge in January 2013, [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/11/15/carlson-will-not-seek-re-election-to-supreme-court/">Carlson will not seek re-election to Supreme Court</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/11/15/carlson-will-not-seek-re-election-to-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Russell sworn in, makes appellate court history</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/05/23/russell-sworn-in-makes-appellate-court-history/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=russell-sworn-in-makes-appellate-court-history</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/05/23/russell-sworn-in-makes-appellate-court-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 13:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>For the MBJ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=41590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>FLORA — Court of Appeals Judge Ermea Russell has been sworn, becoming the first African-American woman to sit on a Mississippi appellate court. Gov. Haley Barbour, who appointed Judge Russell to a vacancy on the court, moved up the effective date of her appointment to allow her to participate in the May 20 dedication of [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/05/23/russell-sworn-in-makes-appellate-court-history/">Russell sworn in, makes appellate court history</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/05/23/russell-sworn-in-makes-appellate-court-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
