<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mississippi Business Journal &#187; remand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/tag/remand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://msbusiness.com</link>
	<description>Mississippi Business Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:16:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Court denies AG&#8217;s motion to remand Entergy case to Chancery</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/08/27/court-denies-ags-montion-to-remand-entergy-case-to-chancery/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=court-denies-ags-montion-to-remand-entergy-case-to-chancery</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/08/27/court-denies-ags-montion-to-remand-entergy-case-to-chancery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MBJ Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENERGY - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratepayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=61856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi has denied the state attorney general’s motion to remand a lawsuit against Entergy Mississippi Inc. and other Entergy companies to state Chancery Court, according to Entergy. Under the ruling, the lawsuit will continue to be addressed by the U.S. District Court. “We’re pleased [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/08/27/court-denies-ags-montion-to-remand-entergy-case-to-chancery/">Court denies AG&#8217;s motion to remand Entergy case to Chancery</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/08/27/court-denies-ags-montion-to-remand-entergy-case-to-chancery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
