<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mississippi Business Journal &#187; sierra club</title>
	<atom:link href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/tag/sierra-club/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://msbusiness.com</link>
	<description>Mississippi Business Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:01:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sierra Club: Poll shows customer opposition to rate hikes via Kemper coal plant</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/01/31/sierra-club-poll-shows-customer-opposition-to-rate-hikes-via-kemper-coal-plant/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sierra-club-poll-shows-customer-opposition-to-rate-hikes-via-kemper-coal-plant</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/01/31/sierra-club-poll-shows-customer-opposition-to-rate-hikes-via-kemper-coal-plant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clay Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENERGY - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MBJ FEATURE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Power Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Public Service Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sierra club]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=68882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Sierra Club was supposed to release last Thursday the results of a poll meant to gauge Mississippi Power Co. ratepayers’ attitudes toward the Kemper County coal plant. The environmental group delayed the results because of a hearing in which the Mississippi Public Service Commission reached a rate case settlement with the utility. &#62;&#62; Read [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/01/31/sierra-club-poll-shows-customer-opposition-to-rate-hikes-via-kemper-coal-plant/">Sierra Club: Poll shows customer opposition to rate hikes via Kemper coal plant</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/01/31/sierra-club-poll-shows-customer-opposition-to-rate-hikes-via-kemper-coal-plant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analyst disputes claim that Kemper plant is 70 percent completed</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/11/21/analyst-disputes-claim-that-kemper-plant-is-70-percent-completed/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=analyst-disputes-claim-that-kemper-plant-is-70-percent-completed</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/11/21/analyst-disputes-claim-that-kemper-plant-is-70-percent-completed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clay Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENERGY - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MBJ FEATURE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kemper County Coal plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Business Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sierra club]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=65649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A week after Mississippi Power Co. said its Kemper County coal plant was 70 percent complete, a report by an energy analyst commissioned by the Sierra Club disputed that claim. David Schlissel, an analyst with the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, in a report commissioned by longtime Kemper opponent the Sierra Club, said [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/11/21/analyst-disputes-claim-that-kemper-plant-is-70-percent-completed/">Analyst disputes claim that Kemper plant is 70 percent completed</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/11/21/analyst-disputes-claim-that-kemper-plant-is-70-percent-completed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mississippi Power appeals rate hike denial</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/07/15/mississippi-power-appeals-rate-hike-denial/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mississippi-power-appeals-rate-hike-denial</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/07/15/mississippi-power-appeals-rate-hike-denial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 06:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clay Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENERGY - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy, Gas & Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOCUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MBJ FEATURE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Topazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Presley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fitch ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonard Bentz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lynn Posey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Power Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Public Service Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public utility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sierra club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Company]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=59665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A few hours after a second overrun for its Kemper County coal plant was revealed, Mississippi Power Co. said last week it was appealing the Public Service Commission’s denial of a rate increase the company had requested to help pay for the facility. The company appealed the PSC’s order to the Mississippi Supreme Court. On [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/07/15/mississippi-power-appeals-rate-hike-denial/">Mississippi Power appeals rate hike denial</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/07/15/mississippi-power-appeals-rate-hike-denial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Independent monitor: Kemper contingency 91 percent gone</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/05/04/independent-monitor-kemper-contingency-91-percent-gone/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=independent-monitor-kemper-contingency-91-percent-gone</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/05/04/independent-monitor-kemper-contingency-91-percent-gone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 16:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clay Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENERGY - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MBJ FEATURE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Power Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Public Service Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sierra club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=56675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Included in the April 24 order granting a new certificate of public convenience and necessity for Mississippi Power Co.’s Kemper County coal plant was a portion of the March report from the project’s independent monitors. The report, which monitors file monthly, said that 91 percent of the company’s contingency has been allocated, with the project [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/05/04/independent-monitor-kemper-contingency-91-percent-gone/">Independent monitor: Kemper contingency 91 percent gone</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/05/04/independent-monitor-kemper-contingency-91-percent-gone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sierra Club still against MPC Kemper coal plant</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/29/sierra-club-still-against-mpc-kemper-coal-plant/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sierra-club-still-against-mpc-kemper-coal-plant</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/29/sierra-club-still-against-mpc-kemper-coal-plant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 06:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clay Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENERGY - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kemper Coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MBJ FEATURE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entegra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Power Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sierra club]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=56477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Mississippi chapter of the Sierra Club is already planning its next challenge to Mississippi Power Co.’s Kemper County coal plant. Public service commissioners voted 2-1 last week to reissue the plant’s certificate of public convenience and necessity. Northern District Commissioner Brandon Presley was the dissenting vote. Last week’s action became necessary March 15, when [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/29/sierra-club-still-against-mpc-kemper-coal-plant/">Sierra Club still against MPC Kemper coal plant</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/29/sierra-club-still-against-mpc-kemper-coal-plant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PSC votes 2-1 to reissue Kemper certificate</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/29/psc-votes-2-1-to-reissue-kemper-certificate-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=psc-votes-2-1-to-reissue-kemper-certificate-2</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/29/psc-votes-2-1-to-reissue-kemper-certificate-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 06:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clay Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENERGY - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MBJ FEATURE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Presley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonard Bentz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lynn Posey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Public Service Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sierra club]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=56480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In what amounted to a procedural meeting, the Mississippi Public Service Commission voted 2-1 last week to reissue the certificate of public convenience and necessity for Mississippi Power Co.’s Kemper County coal plant. Northern District Commissioner Brandon Presley was the lone dissenting vote. The order granting the certificate is a lot like the 2010 order. [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/29/psc-votes-2-1-to-reissue-kemper-certificate-2/">PSC votes 2-1 to reissue Kemper certificate</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/29/psc-votes-2-1-to-reissue-kemper-certificate-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Read April 30 issue of the MBJ</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/27/read-april-30-issue-of-the-mbj/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=read-april-30-issue-of-the-mbj</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/27/read-april-30-issue-of-the-mbj/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MBJ Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Editions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BancorpSouth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kemper County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew Center on the States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sierra club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax incentives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=56253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#62;&#62; KEMPER COUNTY COAL PLANT HEARING Public Service Commission votes 2-1 to reissue Kemper certificate— By Clay Chandler Also in this week’s paper: &#62;&#62; SIERRA CLUB PREPARES ITS LATEST KEMPER CHALLENGE Calls facility an expensive, unnecessary environmental hazard— By Clay Chandler &#62;&#62; STUDY: STATE LAGS IN ASSESSING VALUE OF TAX INCENTIVES Many have no policy [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/27/read-april-30-issue-of-the-mbj/">Read April 30 issue of the MBJ</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/27/read-april-30-issue-of-the-mbj/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kemper deadline met, PSC mull proposed orders</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/08/kemper-deadline-met-psc-mull-proposed-orders/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=kemper-deadline-met-psc-mull-proposed-orders</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/08/kemper-deadline-met-psc-mull-proposed-orders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 06:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clay Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kemper Coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MBJ FEATURE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Presley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entegra Power Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kemper County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonard Bentz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lynn Posey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Power Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Public Service Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public utility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sierra club]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=55429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last Monday was the deadline for parties to submit proposed final orders related to Mississippi Power Company’s lignite coal-fired generation plant in Kemper County. Joining longtime adversaries MPC and the Mississippi chapter of the Sierra Club was Florida-based Entegra Power Group, which markets electric power from natural gas-fueled plants to wholesale customers. In their submissions, [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/08/kemper-deadline-met-psc-mull-proposed-orders/">Kemper deadline met, PSC mull proposed orders</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/08/kemper-deadline-met-psc-mull-proposed-orders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court decision possible setback for Kemper County coal plant</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/25/supreme-court-decision-possible-setback-for-kemper-county-coal-plant/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=supreme-court-decision-possible-setback-for-kemper-county-coal-plant</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/25/supreme-court-decision-possible-setback-for-kemper-county-coal-plant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 20:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clay Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kemper Coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MBJ FEATURE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kemper County Coal plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Power Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Public Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sierra club]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=54639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON- In a 9-0 decision March 15, the Mississippi Supreme Court ruled the Mississippi Public Service Commission’s decision to issue a certificate of public convenience and necessity to Mississippi Power Company to build a coal-fired generation plant in Kemper County was not based on “substantial evidence presented,” as required by law. The decision was in [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/25/supreme-court-decision-possible-setback-for-kemper-county-coal-plant/">Supreme Court decision possible setback for Kemper County coal plant</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/03/25/supreme-court-decision-possible-setback-for-kemper-county-coal-plant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barbour defends proposed offshore drilling regs</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/12/20/barbour-defends-proposed-offshore-drilling-regs/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=barbour-defends-proposed-offshore-drilling-regs</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/12/20/barbour-defends-proposed-offshore-drilling-regs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 03:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENERGY - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british petroleum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Turner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deepwater Horizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov. Phil Bryant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gulf of mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JACKSON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louie Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Business Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Development Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ship Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sierra club]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=49888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — Allowing oil and gas drilling 10 to 12 miles south of Mississippi&#8217;s coastline in the Gulf of Mexico is a good idea because it could generate state revenue, Gov. Haley Barbour said Tuesday. The Mississippi Development Authority on Monday published proposed regulations to lease state waters in the Gulf for the drilling. The [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/12/20/barbour-defends-proposed-offshore-drilling-regs/">Barbour defends proposed offshore drilling regs</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/12/20/barbour-defends-proposed-offshore-drilling-regs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
