<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mississippi Business Journal &#187; tort reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/tag/tort-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://msbusiness.com</link>
	<description>Mississippi Business Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:02:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Alabama court ruling could boost Mississippi’s business recruitment</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/22/alabama-court-ruling-could-boost-mississippis-business-recruitment/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=alabama-court-ruling-could-boost-mississippis-business-recruitment</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/22/alabama-court-ruling-could-boost-mississippis-business-recruitment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 19:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clay Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MBJ FEATURE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pfizer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=71939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A recent ruling by the Supreme Court of Alabama could threaten to roll back some of the principles of that state’s tort reform efforts. It could also give Mississippi an advantage when the two states are pursuing the same economic development projects. Innovator liability is the theory the Alabama court’s decision codified. It essentially allows [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/22/alabama-court-ruling-could-boost-mississippis-business-recruitment/">Alabama court ruling could boost Mississippi’s business recruitment</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/22/alabama-court-ruling-could-boost-mississippis-business-recruitment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Read March 8 issue of MBJ</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/08/read-march-8-issue-of-mbj/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=read-march-8-issue-of-mbj</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/08/read-march-8-issue-of-mbj/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MBJ Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Editions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MBJ FEATURE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance & employee benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate increases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=71051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#62;&#62;TORT REFORM Damages cap ruling could invite another challenge- by Clay Chandler Also in this week’s paper: &#62;&#62; CONVENTIONS Face-lift sought for Coliseum in Jackson, Trade Mart must soldier on without upgrades- by Ted Carter &#62;&#62; GULF COAST Gulfport engineer Frank Wilem hosts TV show, fishes, writes techno-thriller &#62;&#62;KEEPING OUR EYE ON Jordan Downs, policy adviser to [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/08/read-march-8-issue-of-mbj/">Read March 8 issue of MBJ</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/08/read-march-8-issue-of-mbj/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State courts not bound by federal court’s cap ruling</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/08/state-courts-not-bound-by-federal-courts-cap-ruling/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=state-courts-not-bound-by-federal-courts-cap-ruling</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/08/state-courts-not-bound-by-federal-courts-cap-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 22:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clay Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MBJ FEATURE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages caps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=71318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision that Mississippi’s $1 million cap on noneconomic damages arising from civil litigation does not violate the state constitution’s separation of powers clause does not necessarily mean state courts have to abide by the ruling. The cap was considered the centerpiece of tort reform, with supporters saying it would [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/08/state-courts-not-bound-by-federal-courts-cap-ruling/">State courts not bound by federal court’s cap ruling</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/08/state-courts-not-bound-by-federal-courts-cap-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Damages cap ruling could invite another challenge</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/08/damages-cap-ruling-could-invite-another-challenge/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=damages-cap-ruling-could-invite-another-challenge</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/08/damages-cap-ruling-could-invite-another-challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 16:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clay Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MBJ FEATURE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Learmouth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=71277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in late February that Mississippi’s $1 million cap on non-economic damages arising from civil litigation does not violate the state constitution’s separation of powers clause. The appeals court issued the ruling in response to the Mississippi Supreme Court’s decision not to rule on the matter last summer. The [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/08/damages-cap-ruling-could-invite-another-challenge/">Damages cap ruling could invite another challenge</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/08/damages-cap-ruling-could-invite-another-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debate should continue about tort awards and limitations</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/01/debate-should-continue-about-tort-awards-and-limitations/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=debate-should-continue-about-tort-awards-and-limitations</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/01/debate-should-continue-about-tort-awards-and-limitations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 05:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MBJ Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EDITORIALS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Coffee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Chamber of Commerce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=70756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In a recent story by Clay Chandler, a federal appeals court has ruled that Mississippi’s tort cap does not violate separation of powers A three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Mississippi’s $1 million cap on non-economic damages arising out of civil litigation does not violate the state’s constitutional separation of [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/01/debate-should-continue-about-tort-awards-and-limitations/">Debate should continue about tort awards and limitations</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/01/debate-should-continue-about-tort-awards-and-limitations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeals court rules state’s tort cap doesn’t violate separation of powers</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/01/appeals-court-rules-states-tort-cap-doesnt-violate-separation-of-powers/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=appeals-court-rules-states-tort-cap-doesnt-violate-separation-of-powers</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/01/appeals-court-rules-states-tort-cap-doesnt-violate-separation-of-powers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 13:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clay Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MBJ FEATURE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=70819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that Mississippi’s $1 million cap on non-economic damages arising out of civil litigation does not violate the state’s constitutional separation of powers. The question arose out of a personal injury case in federal court in Aberdeen. Plaintiff Lisa Learmonth was involved in a [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/01/appeals-court-rules-states-tort-cap-doesnt-violate-separation-of-powers/">Appeals court rules state’s tort cap doesn’t violate separation of powers</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/01/appeals-court-rules-states-tort-cap-doesnt-violate-separation-of-powers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tort reform case will probably have to wait until 2013</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/11/13/tort-reform-case-will-probably-have-to-wait-until-2013/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tort-reform-case-will-probably-have-to-wait-until-2013</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/11/13/tort-reform-case-will-probably-have-to-wait-until-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=65293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — Resolution of a long-running Mississippi personal injury lawsuit that challenges the constitutionality of a portion of the state&#8217;s tort laws is not expected before next year. The lawsuit, first filed in the federal court in 2006, contends Mississippi&#8217;s $1 million cap on non-economic damages is unfair. The cap was put into place a [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/11/13/tort-reform-case-will-probably-have-to-wait-until-2013/">Tort reform case will probably have to wait until 2013</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/11/13/tort-reform-case-will-probably-have-to-wait-until-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Current tort damages cap statute likely to remain as-is</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/09/02/current-tort-damages-cap-statute-likely-to-remain-as-is/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=current-tort-damages-cap-statute-likely-to-remain-as-is</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/09/02/current-tort-damages-cap-statute-likely-to-remain-as-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 06:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clay Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law & Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MBJ FEATURE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=62081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Mississippi Supreme Court declined in late August to say whether the state’s $1 million cap on noneconomic damages in civil cases is constitutional. If and when the court takes up the matter in the future, justices will most likely be examining the same law then as they did recently. The current law is sound [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/09/02/current-tort-damages-cap-statute-likely-to-remain-as-is/">Current tort damages cap statute likely to remain as-is</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/09/02/current-tort-damages-cap-statute-likely-to-remain-as-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Damages cap issue not gone for good</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/09/02/damages-cap-issue-not-gone-for-good/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=damages-cap-issue-not-gone-for-good</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/09/02/damages-cap-issue-not-gone-for-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 06:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clay Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MBJ FEATURE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=62079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals about a year and a half ago asked the Mississippi Supreme Court to decide if the state’s cap on noneconomic damages was constitutional. On Aug. 23, the state justices declined to do so. The question arose out of a personal injury lawsuit against Sears and Roebuck Co. Plaintiff Lisa [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/09/02/damages-cap-issue-not-gone-for-good/">Damages cap issue not gone for good</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/09/02/damages-cap-issue-not-gone-for-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Read September 3 issue of MBJ</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/08/31/read-september-3-issue-of-mbj/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=read-september-3-issue-of-mbj</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/08/31/read-september-3-issue-of-mbj/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 06:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MBJ Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Editions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulfport-Biloxi Airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=62103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#62;&#62; HURRICANE ISAAC Windpool, private insurer on coast confident they can handle risks— by Ted Carter Also in this week’s paper: &#62;&#62; TORT REFORM Damages cap issue not gone for good— by Clay Chandler &#62;&#62; TORT CONT. As next challenge forms, current cap statute likely to remain as-is— by Clay Chandler &#62;&#62;READY TO FLY New Gulfport-Biloxi Airport director, Clay Williams, [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/08/31/read-september-3-issue-of-mbj/">Read September 3 issue of MBJ</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/08/31/read-september-3-issue-of-mbj/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
