<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mississippi Business Journal &#187; tort</title>
	<atom:link href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/tag/tort/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://msbusiness.com</link>
	<description>Mississippi Business Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:41:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Appeal of lawsuit against &#8216;King of Torts&#8217; authors reinstated</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/15/appeal-of-lawsuit-against-king-of-torts-authors-reinstated/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=appeal-of-lawsuit-against-king-of-torts-authors-reinstated</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/15/appeal-of-lawsuit-against-king-of-torts-authors-reinstated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agenct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judoiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prosecutor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=71448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — The Mississippi Supreme Court has reinstated the appeal of a lawsuit against a former federal prosecutor and a political blogger over a book they co-wrote about the judicial corruption case involving former attorney Richard &#8220;Dickie&#8221; Scruggs. In 2011, FBI agent Hal Neilson sued authors Tom Dawson and Alan Lange and a publishing company. [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/15/appeal-of-lawsuit-against-king-of-torts-authors-reinstated/">Appeal of lawsuit against &#8216;King of Torts&#8217; authors reinstated</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2013/03/15/appeal-of-lawsuit-against-king-of-torts-authors-reinstated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Governor weighs in on tort reform; files documents</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/12/20/governor-weighs-in-on-tort-reform-files-documents/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=governor-weighs-in-on-tort-reform-files-documents</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/12/20/governor-weighs-in-on-tort-reform-files-documents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jackpot justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=67113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — Gov. Phil Bryant says scrapping Mississippi&#8217;s tort reform laws would hinder economic development and cost the state the jobs that it brings. He makes the argument in new court papers that ask a federal court to uphold the constitutionality of a $1 million cap on non-economic damages. The lawsuit, first filed in 2006, [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/12/20/governor-weighs-in-on-tort-reform-files-documents/">Governor weighs in on tort reform; files documents</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/12/20/governor-weighs-in-on-tort-reform-files-documents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tort reform case will probably have to wait until 2013</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/11/13/tort-reform-case-will-probably-have-to-wait-until-2013/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tort-reform-case-will-probably-have-to-wait-until-2013</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/11/13/tort-reform-case-will-probably-have-to-wait-until-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=65293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — Resolution of a long-running Mississippi personal injury lawsuit that challenges the constitutionality of a portion of the state&#8217;s tort laws is not expected before next year. The lawsuit, first filed in the federal court in 2006, contends Mississippi&#8217;s $1 million cap on non-economic damages is unfair. The cap was put into place a [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/11/13/tort-reform-case-will-probably-have-to-wait-until-2013/">Tort reform case will probably have to wait until 2013</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/11/13/tort-reform-case-will-probably-have-to-wait-until-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ex-USM instructor files lawsuit with multiple allegations</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/09/17/ex-usm-instructor-files-lawsuit-with-multiple-allegations/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ex-usm-instructor-files-lawsuit-with-multiple-allegations</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/09/17/ex-usm-instructor-files-lawsuit-with-multiple-allegations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EDUCATION - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faculty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instructor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public university]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teacher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=62775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>HATTIESBURG — A former University of Southern Mississippi faculty member has brought numerous civil claims against the university, asking for reinstatement and unspecified actual and compensatory damages in a lawsuit removed to U.S. District Court. The Hattiesburg American reports Bonnie Gerald also lists former university president Martha Saunders, former provost Robert Lyman and faculty members [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/09/17/ex-usm-instructor-files-lawsuit-with-multiple-allegations/">Ex-USM instructor files lawsuit with multiple allegations</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/09/17/ex-usm-instructor-files-lawsuit-with-multiple-allegations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge considers arguments in damage cap lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/08/30/judge-considers-arguments-in-damage-cap-lawsuit/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=judge-considers-arguments-in-damage-cap-lawsuit</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/08/30/judge-considers-arguments-in-damage-cap-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noneconomic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=62023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>NEW ORLEANS — Each side in a Mississippi tort case has urged a federal appeals court to decide in its favor. The Mississippi Supreme Court ruled last week it does not have enough information to decide whether the state&#8217;s limit on noneconomic damages — as applied to a federal lawsuit — is constitutional. The 5th [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/08/30/judge-considers-arguments-in-damage-cap-lawsuit/">Judge considers arguments in damage cap lawsuit</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/08/30/judge-considers-arguments-in-damage-cap-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court: Not enough info to make ruling on tort cap</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/08/24/court-not-enough-info-to-make-ruling-on-tort-cap/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=court-not-enough-info-to-make-ruling-on-tort-cap</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/08/24/court-not-enough-info-to-make-ruling-on-tort-cap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=61677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — The Mississippi Supreme Court says it does not have enough information to decide whether the state&#8217;s limit on noneconomic damages — as applied to a federal lawsuit — is constitutional. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans, which is considering an appeal of a damage award against Sears, Roebuck and [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/08/24/court-not-enough-info-to-make-ruling-on-tort-cap/">Court: Not enough info to make ruling on tort cap</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/08/24/court-not-enough-info-to-make-ruling-on-tort-cap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State judge declares tort cap unconstitutional; criticizes Legislature</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/24/state-judge-declares-tort-cap-unconstitutional-criticizes-legislature/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=state-judge-declares-tort-cap-unconstitutional-criticizes-legislature</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/24/state-judge-declares-tort-cap-unconstitutional-criticizes-legislature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=56115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>CLARKSDALE — A state judge in Coahoma County has declared a legislatively imposed cap on non-economic damages unconstitutional. Circuit Judge Charles Webster issued the ruling April 20 in a 14-page opinion. He criticized the Legislature for intruding into judicial authority. Webster&#8217;s ruling came in a motion filed by Cleveland attorney Ralph E. Chapman in lawsuit [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/24/state-judge-declares-tort-cap-unconstitutional-criticizes-legislature/">State judge declares tort cap unconstitutional; criticizes Legislature</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/04/24/state-judge-declares-tort-cap-unconstitutional-criticizes-legislature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mississippi Valley Silica appeals judge&#8217;s damage ruling</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/02/mississippi-valley-silica-appeals-judges-damage-ruling/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mississippi-valley-silica-appeals-judges-damage-ruling</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/02/mississippi-valley-silica-appeals-judges-damage-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MANUFACTURING/PRIVATE COMPANIES - Market Sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandblasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=51522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — Mississippi Valley Silica Co. has argued that a trial judge&#8217;s rulings prevented it from presenting an adequate defense of a damage lawsuit. The company yesterday asked the Mississippi Supreme Court to throw out the $7.6 million award to the family of Robert Eastman. Eastman claimed he sustained irreparable lung damage from silicosis caused [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/02/mississippi-valley-silica-appeals-judges-damage-ruling/">Mississippi Valley Silica appeals judge&#8217;s damage ruling</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2012/02/02/mississippi-valley-silica-appeals-judges-damage-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court wants more information in tort cap cases</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/10/17/court-wants-more-information-in-tort-cap-cases/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=court-wants-more-information-in-tort-cap-cases</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/10/17/court-wants-more-information-in-tort-cap-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-economic damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=47303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>JACKSON — The Mississippi Supreme Court has asked attorneys for more information as it considers whether the state&#8217;s limitation on damages in civil cases is constitutional. In an order last month, the court asked attorneys for Sears, Roebuck and Co., and for plaintiff Lisa Learmonth to explain why a Mississippi jury failed to distinguish between [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/10/17/court-wants-more-information-in-tort-cap-cases/">Court wants more information in tort cap cases</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/10/17/court-wants-more-information-in-tort-cap-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case against &#8216;King of Torts&#8217; authors tossed</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/07/19/case-against-king-of-torts-authors-tossed/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=case-against-king-of-torts-authors-tossed</link>
		<comments>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/07/19/case-against-king-of-torts-authors-tossed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/?p=43676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>OXFORD — A Lafayette County circuit judge has dismissed a lawsuit against a former federal prosecutor and a political blogger over a book they co-wrote about the judicial corruption case involving former attorney Richard &#8220;Dickie&#8221; Scruggs. The Oxford Eagle reports that Judge Robert Elliot filed an order July 15 dismissing the suit that FBI agent [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/07/19/case-against-king-of-torts-authors-tossed/">Case against &#8216;King of Torts&#8217; authors tossed</a> appeared first on <a href="http://msbusiness.com">Mississippi Business Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://msbusiness.com/blog/2011/07/19/case-against-king-of-torts-authors-tossed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
