LAST AGAIN — Mississippi ranked No. 50 in latest reading and math scores
We have done it again … Mississippi is ranked 50th in the nation in an education-related subject.
Will the next governor be able to improve on this score?
The good news is that Mississippi improved its score in both reading and math from 2009, but not enough to make up ground on West Virginia at No. 49. Mississippi did rank ahead of the District of Columbia in both categories. Massachusetts ranked No. 1 in both categories with scores of 46 and 51, respectively. Mississippi scores were 21 in reading and 19 in math while the national average were 32 and 34.
>> RELATED STORY: Barksdale gets it when it comes to education
>> RELATED VIDEO: Davis addresses Mississippi Council for Economic Education
>> RELATED STORY: Mississippians more optimistic about economy, education
>> RELATED STORY: Economist — Health, education key to economic growth
Below is a state-by-state look at the percentage of eighth-graders who scored at or above reading and math proficiency levels on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, which is administered by the Education Department’s National Center for Education Statistics. Proficiency levels in both subjects are shown for both 2009 and 2011, with reading scores in the first two columns and math scores in the next two.
| 2009 | 2011 | 2009 | 2011 | ||
| Jurisdictions | at or above proficient in reading | at or above proficient in reading | at or above proficient in math | at or above proficient in math | |
| National public | 30 | 32 | 33 | 34 | |
| Alabama | 24 | 26 | 20 | 20 | |
| Alaska | 27 | 31 | 33 | 35 | |
| Arizona | 27 | 28 | 29 | 31 | |
| Arkansas | 27 | 28 | 27 | 29 | |
| California | 22 | 24 | 23 | 25 | |
| Colorado | 32 | 40 | 40 | 43 | |
| Connecticut | 43 | 45 | 40 | 38 | |
| Delaware | 31 | 33 | 32 | 32 | |
| Dist. of Columbia | 14 | 16 | 11 17 | ||
| Florida | 32 | 30 | 29 | 28 | |
| Georgia | 27 | 28 | 27 | 28 | |
| Hawaii | 22 | 26 | 25 | 30 | |
| Idaho | 33 | 34 | 38 | 37 | |
| Illinois | 33 | 34 | 33 | 33 | |
| Indiana | 32 | 32 | 36 | 34 | |
| Iowa | 32 | 33 | 34 | 34 | |
| Kansas | 33 | 35 | 39 | 41 | |
| Kentucky | 33 | 36 | 27 | 31 | |
| Louisiana | 20 | 22 | 20 | 22 | |
| Maine | 35 | 39 | 35 | 39 | |
| Maryland | 36 | 40 | 40 | 40 | |
| Massachusetts | 43 | 46 | 52 | 51 | |
| Michigan | 31 | 32 | 31 | 31 | |
| Minnesota | 38 | 39 | 47 | 48 | |
| >>MISSISSIPPI | 19 | 21 | 15 | 19 | |
| Missouri | 34 | 35 | 35 | 32 | |
| Montana | 38 | 42 | 44 | 46 | |
| Nebraska | 35 | 35 | 35 | 33 | |
| Nevada | 22 | 26 | 25 | 29 | |
| New Hampshire | 39 | 40 | 43 | 44 | |
| New Jersey | 42 | 45 | 44 | 47 | |
| New Mexico | 22 | 22 | 20 | 24 | |
| New York | 33 | 35 | 34 | 30 | |
| North Carolina | 29 | 31 | 36 | 37 | |
| North Dakota | 34 | 34 | 43 | 43 | |
| Ohio | 37 | 37 | 36 | 39 | |
| Oklahoma | 26 | 27 | 24 | 27 | |
| Oregon | 33 | 33 | 37 | 33 | |
| Pennsylvania | 40 | 38 | 40 | 39 | |
| Rhode Island | 28 | 33 | 28 | 34 | |
| South Carolina | 24 | 27 | 30 | 32 | |
| South Dakota | 37 | 35 | 42 | 42 | |
| Tennessee | 28 | 27 | 25 | 24 | |
| Texas | 27 | 27 | 36 | 40 | |
| Utah | 33 | 35 | 35 | 35 | |
| Vermont | 41 | 44 | 43 | 46 | |
| Virginia | 32 | 36 | 36 | 40 | |
| Washington | 36 | 37 | 39 | 40 | |
| West Virginia | 22 | 24 | 19 | 21 | |
| Wisconsin | 34 | 35 | 39 | 41 | |
| Wyoming | 34 | 38 | 35 | 37 | |
| DoDEA | 39 | 39 | 36 | 37 |

Article states miss scores went up. Chart shows scores went down. Why?
We need an organized pre k education system. Look at other southern states who have organized pre k. For instance look at the Georgia scores.
Gee, maybe we are using a strategy that doesn’t work all that well. A tax structure that doesn’t generate much revenue results in limits on funding. Schools without enough resources turn out people who are not competitive; those guys then go on to elect more legislators that do the same about revenue and results. Guys, this is not working. Time to try something radical and different, like more taxes and better funded schools.
In the article author Ross Reily asks the question..
“Will the next governor be able to improve on this score?”
Good question, but is it a question we should be asking about our next Governor? Is it his job to improve education? What exactly is the job of a governor?
stan@msvoterblog.com http://msvoterblog.com/?p=188