To ID tax-and-spenders is to look past the label provided by opponents
Labels are a hard thing to get rid of.
In real life, they have that sticky adhesive that is bound to ruin any piece of clothing if gets attached.
In the political and perceptive world, labels are much the same.
During the last election cycle, many Mississippi Democrats were labeled as free spenders for voting on particular tax measures.
With that in mind, emotions were high last week in a debate about — you guessed it — taxes.
Several Democrats said opponents sent mailers claiming they voted for a large number of tax increases, unfairly counting times they voted to raise or renew taxes requested by individual cities and counties.
Last week, the bill was to renew a 2 percent tax on Hancock County hotels for two years to fund tourism promotion. The bill passed the House, 69-44.
So, does that mean those who voted for the bill are big government, nut-job liberals? Probably not.
We have created such stereotypes in politics, that the ethics and morals of actual people are being questioned, based on votes like last week. And that vote — if you want to label it — was pro-business.
It will provide needed funds for communities to promote themselves to bring more tourists in, therefore bringing more money to the businesses and families in Hancock County.
Therefore, should the 44 who voted against the bill be labeled as anti-business?
>> Contact Mississippi Business Journal editor Ross Reily at firstname.lastname@example.org or (601) 364-1018