<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Magnolia Marketplace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://msbusiness.com/magnoliamarketplace/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://msbusiness.com/magnoliamarketplace</link>
	<description>Mississippi Business Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 13:00:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Supreme Court deals Hood another bad loss with fees rulings by Dillon</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/magnoliamarketplace/2012/05/24/supreme-court-deals-hood-another-bad-loss-in-fees-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-8548</link>
		<dc:creator>Dillon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 13:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/magnoliamarketplace/?p=1133#comment-8548</guid>
		<description>It is interesting that the AG feels the Court &quot;created&quot; law. That argument works to gain public favor sometimes and I&#039;d bet a can of coke that (though it is a strange tactic for a Democrat) Mr. Hood will use this as another campaign bullet - I fought against the activist courts. But this case is, at best, a stretch for that argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting that the AG feels the Court &#8220;created&#8221; law. That argument works to gain public favor sometimes and I&#8217;d bet a can of coke that (though it is a strange tactic for a Democrat) Mr. Hood will use this as another campaign bullet &#8211; I fought against the activist courts. But this case is, at best, a stretch for that argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hosemann responds to DOJ employee who called Miss. &#8220;disgusting and shameful&#8221; by KennyR</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/magnoliamarketplace/2012/05/08/hosemann-lashes-out-at-doj-employee-who-called-miss-disgusting-and-shameful/comment-page-1/#comment-8531</link>
		<dc:creator>KennyR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 20:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/magnoliamarketplace/?p=1103#comment-8531</guid>
		<description>We should get this thing into the courts and appeal processes as soon as possible.  Otherwise the DOJ will function as a puppet of the Democratic party and delay implementation of our law until after the presidential election.  Delbert should get the process going with that in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should get this thing into the courts and appeal processes as soon as possible.  Otherwise the DOJ will function as a puppet of the Democratic party and delay implementation of our law until after the presidential election.  Delbert should get the process going with that in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hosemann responds to DOJ employee who called Miss. &#8220;disgusting and shameful&#8221; by B.J.</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/magnoliamarketplace/2012/05/08/hosemann-lashes-out-at-doj-employee-who-called-miss-disgusting-and-shameful/comment-page-1/#comment-8530</link>
		<dc:creator>B.J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 19:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/magnoliamarketplace/?p=1103#comment-8530</guid>
		<description>The people of MS voted on this change. This should be a mute question.
DOJ can go to ____!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The people of MS voted on this change. This should be a mute question.<br />
DOJ can go to ____!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hosemann responds to DOJ employee who called Miss. &#8220;disgusting and shameful&#8221; by Reba G. Cook</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/magnoliamarketplace/2012/05/08/hosemann-lashes-out-at-doj-employee-who-called-miss-disgusting-and-shameful/comment-page-1/#comment-8529</link>
		<dc:creator>Reba G. Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 13:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/magnoliamarketplace/?p=1103#comment-8529</guid>
		<description>Why would three liberal judges in DC be any fairer than the DOJ? Everyone needs a whipping boy and Mississippi was appointed to that position years ago. Mississippi will get nothing from this administration that isn&#039;t approved by Bennie Thompson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would three liberal judges in DC be any fairer than the DOJ? Everyone needs a whipping boy and Mississippi was appointed to that position years ago. Mississippi will get nothing from this administration that isn&#8217;t approved by Bennie Thompson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bentz: MBJ&#8217;s Kemper coverage inaccurate by Thomas Baldwin</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/magnoliamarketplace/2012/04/03/bentz-mbjs-kemper-coverage-inaccurate/comment-page-1/#comment-8396</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Baldwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 00:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/magnoliamarketplace/?p=1055#comment-8396</guid>
		<description>This is an excellent, if brief, report.  Clay should continue to get Bentz and Posey on the record even if all they do is point their finger and tell you to &quot;quote them&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent, if brief, report.  Clay should continue to get Bentz and Posey on the record even if all they do is point their finger and tell you to &#8220;quote them&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Beer ABW bill clears the Senate by FuzzyBrew &#124; Raise your Pints&#8217; ABW bill passes Mississippi Senate</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/magnoliamarketplace/2012/03/12/beer-abw-bill-clears-the-senate/comment-page-1/#comment-8251</link>
		<dc:creator>FuzzyBrew &#124; Raise your Pints&#8217; ABW bill passes Mississippi Senate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/magnoliamarketplace/?p=1016#comment-8251</guid>
		<description>[...] next step, according to the Mississippi Business Journal, is &#8220;for whatever differences the two chambers have over the legislation to be ironed out in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] next step, according to the Mississippi Business Journal, is &#8220;for whatever differences the two chambers have over the legislation to be ironed out in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bentz, Presley agree: AT&amp;T oversight removal bill bad business by claytonian</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/magnoliamarketplace/2012/02/24/bentz-presley-agree-att-oversight-removal-bill-bad-business/comment-page-1/#comment-8183</link>
		<dc:creator>claytonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 20:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/magnoliamarketplace/?p=963#comment-8183</guid>
		<description>I’ve been an ATT small business customer for many years ( 35+ ) and I have to say this is not the first time I’ve experienced this type very costly ATT corporate misconduct...
 
My small business runs on local telephone commerce and I’ve been an good ATT customer utilizing their “auto-pay” program where my credit card is billed at the beginning of each month with my current ATT business telephone charges.
 
Sometime in November of 2011, my credit card number ( the one used for these charges ) was hijacked on an internet site, cancelled, and was replaced by my bank.
 
I called ATT to give them my new credit card charge information on Feb. 7th of 2012 after noticing the bill was no longer correctly charged to the new account number. I spoke with three different operators, from three different departments at ATT, and after nearly an hour of repeating my story, I was able to confirm that they had correctly logged the current charge information, and had paid my outstanding charges to “current” status. 
 
Imagine my surprise when on Friday morning 2-24-12, the business telephone service had been disconnected and my business customers were sending along messages that my business telephone numbers had been “disconnected”...! 
 
I called ATT, ( making a fair guess at what had happed ) and after confirming that my bill was paid in full, and current, I asked to have my phone numbers turned back on, to which they flatly refused. I asked why, if it had been less than an hour since it was turned off, and their mistake and not mine, that they could not simply turn the phone number back on. They put me on hold a number of times for very extended periods ( 10-15 min without contact ) and I had to hang up and call again two separate times on Friday 2-24-12 to reestablish this same conversation , then asking for a supervisor each time. The people who I spoke with were unanimous in their obstinate refusal to address my simple question and each gave me the sequential run-around, person after person. 
 
My business telephone service is now disconnected even when I was assured earlier in the month ( 2-07-12 ) that all of my telephone bills would be paid automatically from that point on.
 
This is not the kind of service a California service company should be providing their good customers and I believe the time has come for the California PUC to think about opening the state’s home and business telephone services to a broader competitive market as I believe ( after numerous similar experiences over the years with SBC, PAC-Bell and now ATT ) the same kind of abusive-non-response and self-serving attitude for the people who are each claiming to want to “Help you” with your telephone service issues.  They invariably tie their customers into a continuous long drawn travail with numerous “departments” and unresponsive ranks of middle management muddle... I guess they are hoping most customers will simply give up and pay extra money to restore services that had been unreasonably discontinued.
 
Please help us make the telephone service provider for the State of California as fine as the State which grants it this valuable monopoly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been an ATT small business customer for many years ( 35+ ) and I have to say this is not the first time I’ve experienced this type very costly ATT corporate misconduct&#8230;</p>
<p>My small business runs on local telephone commerce and I’ve been an good ATT customer utilizing their “auto-pay” program where my credit card is billed at the beginning of each month with my current ATT business telephone charges.</p>
<p>Sometime in November of 2011, my credit card number ( the one used for these charges ) was hijacked on an internet site, cancelled, and was replaced by my bank.</p>
<p>I called ATT to give them my new credit card charge information on Feb. 7th of 2012 after noticing the bill was no longer correctly charged to the new account number. I spoke with three different operators, from three different departments at ATT, and after nearly an hour of repeating my story, I was able to confirm that they had correctly logged the current charge information, and had paid my outstanding charges to “current” status. </p>
<p>Imagine my surprise when on Friday morning 2-24-12, the business telephone service had been disconnected and my business customers were sending along messages that my business telephone numbers had been “disconnected”&#8230;! </p>
<p>I called ATT, ( making a fair guess at what had happed ) and after confirming that my bill was paid in full, and current, I asked to have my phone numbers turned back on, to which they flatly refused. I asked why, if it had been less than an hour since it was turned off, and their mistake and not mine, that they could not simply turn the phone number back on. They put me on hold a number of times for very extended periods ( 10-15 min without contact ) and I had to hang up and call again two separate times on Friday 2-24-12 to reestablish this same conversation , then asking for a supervisor each time. The people who I spoke with were unanimous in their obstinate refusal to address my simple question and each gave me the sequential run-around, person after person. </p>
<p>My business telephone service is now disconnected even when I was assured earlier in the month ( 2-07-12 ) that all of my telephone bills would be paid automatically from that point on.</p>
<p>This is not the kind of service a California service company should be providing their good customers and I believe the time has come for the California PUC to think about opening the state’s home and business telephone services to a broader competitive market as I believe ( after numerous similar experiences over the years with SBC, PAC-Bell and now ATT ) the same kind of abusive-non-response and self-serving attitude for the people who are each claiming to want to “Help you” with your telephone service issues.  They invariably tie their customers into a continuous long drawn travail with numerous “departments” and unresponsive ranks of middle management muddle&#8230; I guess they are hoping most customers will simply give up and pay extra money to restore services that had been unreasonably discontinued.</p>
<p>Please help us make the telephone service provider for the State of California as fine as the State which grants it this valuable monopoly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Holland: &#8216;Gulf of America&#8217; bill filed to protest GOP agenda by Jerry Cupit</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/magnoliamarketplace/2012/02/09/holland-gulf-of-america-bill-filed-to-protest-gop-agenda/comment-page-1/#comment-8118</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Cupit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/magnoliamarketplace/?p=954#comment-8118</guid>
		<description>Stupid! Just another reason we&#039;re in the shape we&#039;re in. Because of stupid polititions like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stupid! Just another reason we&#8217;re in the shape we&#8217;re in. Because of stupid polititions like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Holland: &#8216;Gulf of America&#8217; bill filed to protest GOP agenda by mike crowson</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/magnoliamarketplace/2012/02/09/holland-gulf-of-america-bill-filed-to-protest-gop-agenda/comment-page-1/#comment-8113</link>
		<dc:creator>mike crowson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/magnoliamarketplace/?p=954#comment-8113</guid>
		<description>What a childish antic..kinda like saying, &quot;I know you are but what am I&quot;, when called a name....not to mention a waste a time and money...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a childish antic..kinda like saying, &#8220;I know you are but what am I&#8221;, when called a name&#8230;.not to mention a waste a time and money&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bradley Arant to host UT professor for entrepreneurial seminar by David Pharr</title>
		<link>http://msbusiness.com/magnoliamarketplace/2012/02/01/bradley-arant-to-host-ut-professor-for-entrepreneurial-seminar/comment-page-1/#comment-8084</link>
		<dc:creator>David Pharr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msbusiness.com/magnoliamarketplace/?p=942#comment-8084</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Clay.  To clarify, $195 covers attendance both days, plus breakfast &amp; lunch both days, light refreshments, networking reception &amp; materials.  It also looks like limited sponsorships may be available to prevent the tuition fee from becoming an obstacle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Clay.  To clarify, $195 covers attendance both days, plus breakfast &amp; lunch both days, light refreshments, networking reception &amp; materials.  It also looks like limited sponsorships may be available to prevent the tuition fee from becoming an obstacle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
