Home » NEWS » Judge refuses to toss Scruggs' corruption conviction

Judge refuses to toss Scruggs' corruption conviction

OXFROD — A federal judge yesterday refused to throw out the 2008 conviction of attorney Zach Scruggs in a corruption case that also involved his father, well-known trial lawyer Dickie Scruggs.

Zach Scruggs pleaded guilty to knowing about — but not reporting — illegal contacts with a judge. Since his release from prison in 2010, he has insisted on his innocence and sought to get that conviction thrown out, saying he was coerced into pleading guilty.

U.S. District Judge Neal B. Biggers in Oxford denied the motion to vacate the conviction.

The case at issue involved an attempt to bribe a Mississippi circuit court judge. Zach Scruggs pleaded guilty to misprision of a felony for allegedly knowing about a crime and not reporting it. In attempting to get the conviction thrown out, Scruggs said he only knew of an attempt to influence the judge, not bribery.

In his filings, Scruggs noted a Supreme Court case involving former Enron chief Jeffrey Skilling, in which the high court limited the scope of the so-called honest services law, saying prosecutors can use the law only in cases where evidence shows the defendant accepted bribes or kickbacks.

“Petitioner claims that he is ‘actually innocent’ of the misprision of a felony conviction to which he pleaded guilty because he did not know about the bribe,” Biggers wrote in a long memorandum accompanying his ruling.

Biggers said Scruggs also argued that even if he did know about money paid to the judge, “he would have assumed that the payment was a gratuity and not a bribe.”

Biggers rejected the argument, along with claims by Scruggs of government coercion and ineffective assistance from his lawyer.

Biggers said that if Scruggs was so certain of his innocence he should have appealed his conviction or sentence but did not. Biggers also noted that the three-year sentence Scruggs received in the plea bargain was much less than the maximum 75 years allowed by law.

Biggers also said Scruggs could have extracted himself from the bribery scheme at any point but evidence showed he did not. He said that considering all the evidence in the case, it was likely Scruggs would have been convicted by a jury.


… we’d like to ask for your support. More people are reading the Mississippi Business Journal than ever before, but advertising revenues for all conventional media are falling fast. Unlike many, we do not use a pay wall, because we want to continue providing Mississippi’s most comprehensive business news each and every day. But that takes time, money and hard work. We do it because it is important to us … and equally important to you, if you value the flow of trustworthy news and information which have always kept America strong and free for more than 200 years.

If those who read our content will help fund it, we can continue to bring you the very best in news and information. Please consider joining us as a valued member, or if you prefer, make a one-time contribution.

Click for more info

About Megan Wright

One comment

  1. “gratuity and not a bribe”…..Zach, Zach, Zach, are you just a “Daddy’s Boy” or are you just that pathetically stupid? Your profession is the cornerstone of our free society; however your immature, selfish, and egotistical greed has permanently stained a profession that at one time was considered to be a noble one. Judge Biggers decision proves that there is justice in our system.

Leave a Reply