Home » FOCUS » Mississippi lacks state tax credits, net metering for alternative energy

Mississippi lacks state tax credits, net metering for alternative energy

Currently it is more profitable for businesses to go “green” by purchasing energy-efficient and alternative energy devices than it is for residents, says Shelley Rhoden, president of Alternative Energy Solutions.

“The reason for that is because there are MACR (Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery) tax benefits for businesses,” Rhoden said. “This year businesses have a 50 percent bonus depreciation, which means solar has a five-year depreciation period. The first year a business can take 50 percent and the remaining depreciation can be spread out over the next five years. In addition, businesses qualify for a 30 percent federal tax credit, and they will see a reduction in their electric bill. We see more and more businesses investing in solar and solar thermal as a result of these incentives.”

Rhoden said there would be far more demand for alternative energy such as solar panels that produce electricity if the Mississippi Legislature would get with the program. Alternative energy tax incentives have been rejected by the Mississippi Legislature for five years in a row. The Legislature has also turned down net metering to allow people to install alternative energy and sell excess production back to the power company. In Rhoden’s opinion, the failure of those initiatives is due to a well-heeled utility lobby.

“Monopoly power companies have lobbied against this,” Rhoden said. “Forty-six other states in the U.S. allow net metering. Mississippi is one of the few that has not allowed it yet. Mississippi has an abundance of sunlight that can be converted to energy. New Jersey, in comparison, has a far less sunshine, but they out install us in solar. They have wonderful solar incentive programs that makes it affordable for their residents to embrace renewable energy, and that is what we need to do here.

“Our neighbors in Louisiana get the 30 percent federal tax credit, and they also get a 50 percent tax credit on the state level. Louisiana electric/utility companies will purchase the solar generated electricity that was produced in excess of what your home or business used. The Mississippi Public Service Commission and some legislators and lobbyists for Mississippi Power apparently don’t want that. We’re struggling now because of that. That is why other states have more solar power installed than Mississippi.”

Rhoden said a properly sized solar photovoltaic system could offset 50 to 70 percent of electric usage.


“The payback period for solar installation could be as short as five to 10 years if we had the rebates, incentives and net metering policies other states have,” Rhoden said. “So let your representatives know we want solar incentives that will make installing solar affordable for all residents in Mississippi. I want Mississippi to get the same tax advantages as other states. I know eventually Mississippi is going to come around and realize that tax credits and net metering are the responsible things to do, and they are going to pass legislation that will make it more affordable for both homeowners and businesses.”

Rhoden said alternative energy is considered more expensive than producing electricity from coal. But she doesn’t believe that coal in Mississippi is cheap when you factor in environmental and health impacts. She said there is no such thing as “clean coal;” it pollutes the environment.

“All coal is dirty,” Rhoden said. “It affects the climate by releasing carbon to the atmosphere. It causes global warming.”

Rhoden said Mississippi has supported solar manufacturing with providing $75 million in loan assistance to a Stion manufacturing plant in Hattiesburg that manufactures low-cost, thin-film solar panels.

“The state is also providing clean energy tax incentives and workforce training incentives for the project,” she said. “Local officials are providing tax and other financial incentives to assist with the project, as well.”

Rhoden said it would only make sense for the same Legislature that has passed legislation to support the solar plant to provide jobs would also support initiatives that would allow companies like Alternate Energy Solutions to hire more employees for installations that help the residents save money on their electric bills.

Doing the right thing for the environment, Rhoden said, can also be economical. An example is the City of Hattiesburg, which has purchased solar panels to aerate sewage lagoons.

“The City of Hattiesburg has taken a step towards reducing their energy costs by installing four of our solar power long-distance water circulators in their new north wastewater lagoon,” Rhoden said. “They are saving money, and I think are planning on incorporating more alternative energy in the future.”

Bert Kuyrkendall, director of engineering for the City of Hattiesburg, said the circulation equipment, known as Solar Bees, have really worked well.

“The Solar Bees are replacing a certain number of aerators that run off the grid,” Kuyrkendall said. “What time frame will it pay itself off? We look for seven to 10 year payback with alternative energy. What we have done so far is pretty small. It is a modest beginning. We have a big project coming up replacing the lagoon system with a mechanical treatment plant. We are looking at the solar options with that. That isn’t for sure yet.”

The city will look at the possibility of harvesting gas from the treatment process to fuel equipment, or using solar arrays. Kuykendall said that anaerobic treatment systems can provide gas to power generation systems, but that industrial waste such as that from a chicken processing plant have a stronger effluent that is more efficient at generating gas.


… we’d like to ask for your support. More people are reading the Mississippi Business Journal than ever before, but advertising revenues for all conventional media are falling fast. Unlike many, we do not use a pay wall, because we want to continue providing Mississippi’s most comprehensive business news each and every day. But that takes time, money and hard work. We do it because it is important to us … and equally important to you, if you value the flow of trustworthy news and information which have always kept America strong and free for more than 200 years.

If those who read our content will help fund it, we can continue to bring you the very best in news and information. Please consider joining us as a valued member, or if you prefer, make a one-time contribution.

Click for more info

About Becky Gillette


  1. Mississippi is one of 4 states that does not have net metering:

    Of those 4, TN is largely covered by TVA, which has a very generous credit for consumer solar generation–almost double what a ratepayer would pay for the same electricity. TVA says they hope consumer solar generation will keep them from having to build new plants. Even AL passed a law called “PAE” (Payment for Alternative Energy) that requires utilities to pay consumer generators at least 7 cents per kWh. Only South Dakota and MS have absolutely no provision for net metering.

    The MS Public Service Commission sponsored a day of excellent presentations about net metering in the summer of 2011. There is a net metering docket on the PSC website (2011-AD-2). Commissioner Presley has always been in favor of net metering (along with the other 4 standards of the 2005 Energy Policy Act, none of which Entergy or MS Power “allowed” in the state: docket 2007-AD-201). But no progress has been made. The legislature introduced 9 net metering bills last year; none got out of committee.

    Entergy follows the law in LA and supports net metering there. They have not voiced much opposition in MS lately. But MS Power executive Johnny Atherton said at a conference last year: Mississippi Power will “NEVER ALLOW NET METERING IN MISSISSIPPI.” And their press spokesperson, Cindy Duvall, continues to assert that “Mississippi doesn’t have enough sun.”

    It’s up to you, as citizens, to fight this corporate control. Write or call your Public Service Commissioner and your state legislators.

  2. Net metering is something we have been interested in for some time. Thanks, MBJ for this information. Thanks, Julia O’Neal for your comments.

  3. Here it is, the end of 2015, and little to nothing has changed. I am still doing searches, trying to find an even remotely affordable solar panel solution to my electric bills that are, during the summer, higher than my house payment. I am still not finding ANYTHING. Every company I try says they are not in business in MS because of the Solar Unfriendly policies here. I am on a small fixed income, when my electric bill is well over a third of my income, that is an extreme hardship, especially when my thermostat is on 78 to 80 and I’m staying put in front of a fan. The Kemper plant should have never been allowed. Instead, Mississippi Power should have been investing in selling solar and/or wind power solutions and buying back the excess. Just like so many other situations in this state, instead of moving into the future, we are being held back with yet another dirty power plant and the highest electric bills of anyone I know in 7 other states. Shame on every single person who had anything to do with Kemper and our anti-solar or wind policies.

    I strongly believe the ONLY reason MS is one of the poorest states in the country, despite having casinos and a spectacular gulf coast is because of congressional greed…why take care of your constituents for that handsome paycheck you get when you can multiply it by taking care of special interests? That is what you get when you allow career politicians.

Leave a Reply