Home » OPINION » Editorials » OUR VIEW: C Spire has best interest of Mississippi at heart

OUR VIEW: C Spire has best interest of Mississippi at heart

So, let’s get this straight.

There was a bid process for the procurement of the state’s telecommunications services. C Spire outbid AT&T by a whopping $32 million.

Now, AT&T is protesting the entire process that it has never had a problem with in the past.

None of that seems to be in dispute.

After multiple requests, Michele Blocker, the Chief Administrative Officer with the Mississippi Department of Technology Services confirmed that this week to the Mississippi Business Journal with the following short, concise statement.

“On December 21, 2017, the MS Department of Information Technology Services (ITS) Board approved several awards relating to the State’s procurement of telecommunications services.  (More information on this procurement, RFP 5000, can be found at www.its.ms.gov.)  One of these awards, Voice and Data Network Services, was made to CSPIRE.  Subsequently, AT&T submitted a formal Protest challenging this award pursuant to ITS policies and procedures.  This Protest is currently under consideration by the ITS Executive Director.”

ITS Executive Director Craig Oregon, however, in trying to fully respect the appeals process, would not comment on the process, the outcome or the protest as it has now been nearly four months since C Spire won the bid.

We get that business is business and AT&T wants to keep the lucrative contract with the state, and we understand C Spire wants to take over what is loosely called the state’s land line telecommunication contract.

In a statement to FierceWireless, AT&T defends its position.

“We have an historic commitment to building communications networks to serve Mississippi businesses, residents and government,” AT&T explained in a statement to FierceWireless when questioned about the issue. “As a part of the normal contracting and bid process, we filed our concerns with the Department of Information Technology Services regarding the recent statewide technology RFP. While our bid fully met the specific, clearly identified requirements outlined in the RFP, we believe the selected bid does not. We appreciate this review by the department and look forward to their response.”

» READ MORE: C Spire’s rivalry with AT&T heats up

Yet, C Spire has won out in a process that AT&T never thought was problematic until it actually lost.

C Spire has historically been the primary awardee or shared a significant portion of the contract for wireless but last year it was able to participate in the RFP process in which the state ITS selected the Mississippi-based company for most of the services to be provided to the state of Mississippi on the landline side.

Considering the updated fiber lines and technology that C Spire has and will use for this contract, it should have beaten out AT&T even without outbidding by $32 million.

But Mississippi gets the best of both worlds. Mississippi gets state-of-the-art technology and it gets it for $32 million less than AT&T would cost. Lord knows there are any number of projects in Mississippi that could use the $32 million it would save by having C Spire as its land line provider.

It’s a slam dunk, right?

But AT&T, which is trying to protect the monopoly it has enjoyed for more than 100 years, has gummed up the process and now the state is dealing with a protracted protest process in which very little information is coming out.

So, we wait.

The state waits. Law enforcement waits. Education waits.

In this instance, C Spire is the best choice for Mississippi and C Spire has the best interest of Mississippi at heart.



… we’d like to ask for your support. More people are reading the Mississippi Business Journal than ever before, but advertising revenues for all conventional media are falling fast. Unlike many, we do not use a pay wall, because we want to continue providing Mississippi’s most comprehensive business news each and every day. But that takes time, money and hard work. We do it because it is important to us … and equally important to you, if you value the flow of trustworthy news and information which have always kept America strong and free for more than 200 years.

If those who read our content will help fund it, we can continue to bring you the very best in news and information. Please consider joining us as a valued member, or if you prefer, make a one-time contribution.

Click for more info

About MBJ Staff

One comment

  1. Perhaps, as a “Business Journal”, you should report the facts more carefully…. if at all.

    What AT&T is disputing is C-Spires qualifications under the bidding process. Outlined in the bidding process are parameters that the bidding companies are to meet. Such things as having the infrastructure in place to provide these services is key, when entering a bid to provide such services. AT&T is disputing is C-Spires ability to meet the same qualifications that AT&T has had to, in submitting its bid. C-Spire/Cellular South makes use of AT&T’s infrastructure in many instances by way of government regulations that mandate AT&T resell all or part of its own network, in order to bring its data/communication to its end-users. As such, C-Spire does NOT have the ability to provide the large scale services, statewide, within its own right. Additionally, C-Spire/Cellular South employs FAR fewer employees in Mississippi to Engineer, Place/Install, and Maintain it’s infrastructure, thus making it incredibly unlikely that it will be doing so under this Contract. Most likely, they will be making use of the Government Regulations that require AT&T to provide the CLEC/UNE service to the customer premise….. so how is it possible that C-Spire is allowed to make a bid within a process it doesn’t have the qualifications to participate within?

    How can a “Business Journal” find this to be an acceptable practice….. to win a bid based on depending on the services and infrastructure of the same company that it is condemning, all while not being able to actually provide these services on roll-out, or in the manner that the bidding process dictated?

    This is a not-so-vailed attempt by C-Spire to use State Funds to increase its limited existing infrastructure, during its attempt to provide the contracted services to Mississippi. This in itself isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but doing on the backs of other Companies and Local municipalities is.

    Consider the issues many, many municipalities in Mississippi have with joint-use lines not being maintained, and repairs not being effected in reasonable timeframes. Most of the poorly maintained fiber infrastructure in Mississippi is a direct result of other such companies placing their own fiber, without the local workforce to maintain it following severe weather, traffic accidents, or any other event that causes the lines to be disrupted. Now you wish to uphold a Company that has neither the existing infrastructure nor the workforce to place or maintain these lines, and do so without disruption?

Leave a Reply