Home » OPINION » Columns » GRANT CALLEN — School choice is not a new entitlement.  But Pre-K is.

GRANT CALLEN — School choice is not a new entitlement.  But Pre-K is.


Earlier this week, columnist Bill Crawford penned a piece arguing that school choice proposals authored in recent legislative sessions are not conservative because they represent a “new entitlement.” Instead, Crawford favors publicly funded Pre-K as the best fix for Mississippi’s education woes.

Here’s why he’s wrong.

To be a new entitlement the Legislature would have to appropriate more money for school choice than it already does for K-12 education.  Yet school choice does not require more money – it simply proposes that taxpayers get more bang for their buck with existing funds.

Choice proposals transfer decision-making power to parents and subscribe to the conservative principle that people closest to a problem are the best people to fix it.

Many happily choose traditional public schools, but that choice is largely reserved for those who can afford it. Low-income families who lack the resources to move to neighborhoods with better schools or pay for private school tuition are often trapped in a school someone else chose for them.

School choice levels the playing field, promoting equality of opportunity for all.

What could be more appealing to political conservatives…or liberals…than that?

School choice also introduces a healthy dose of competition into a system with all the problems of a monopoly, namely that overwhelmed operators can get away with offering a mediocre, poor, or even abysmal education because many of their customers can’t go elsewhere.

Crawford argues that increased funding won’t fix public education. On this point we agree. This debate is all about who can spend tax dollars already earmarked for your child’s education more thoughtfully – you or someone tasked with serving every child?  About who deserves the freedom to pivot and make a different choice when necessary – you or someone who doesn’t know your child at all?

The idea that public school students will lose in a competitive environment is not only ludicrous but handily disproven by the evidence.  An expansive body of gold standard empirical research demonstrates that school choice programs not only benefit the students who opt out of public school, but also those students who stay.

School choice programs across the nation and here in Mississippi are producing more satisfied parents, more successful students, and higher expectations for all schools, both private and public.  Yes, students perform better academically, but they also persist and graduate at higher rates, find good jobs, and stay out of prison.

For them, the American dream looks attainable.  Why not give all students the same hope, regardless of socioeconomic status or zip code?

Furthermore, in a choice-friendly environment, everyone – students, parents, administrators, teachers, and innovators – benefits from the increased interest in quality and focus on true accountability.

Now, what about Crawford’s preference for public Pre-K? Whether or not you agree with his claims about its advantages, one fact remains: Creating a public Pre-K program in Mississippi would cost millions and millions of new tax dollars while ignoring altogether the issues plaguing K-12 public education.  And if that’s not a new entitlement, I don’t know what is.

School choice is not a silver bullet, but it offers the most promise for the least money and the least amount of effort.  It relies on the money, decisionmakers, entrepreneurial spirit, and market forces already in place and has the potential to make a difference in the lives of young Americans from day one.


» GRANT CALLEN is the Founder and President of Empower Mississippi, an independent, nonprofit advocacy organization dedicated to changing laws that limit opportunity so Mississippians can flourish.


… we’d like to ask for your support. More people are reading the Mississippi Business Journal than ever before, but advertising revenues for all conventional media are falling fast. Unlike many, we do not use a pay wall, because we want to continue providing Mississippi’s most comprehensive business news each and every day. But that takes time, money and hard work. We do it because it is important to us … and equally important to you, if you value the flow of trustworthy news and information which have always kept America strong and free for more than 200 years.

If those who read our content will help fund it, we can continue to bring you the very best in news and information. Please consider joining us as a valued member, or if you prefer, make a one-time contribution.

Click for more info

About For the MBJ


  1. Rebecca Burcham

    As a small business owner in the state, I am simply appalled at this piece. Year in year out, business owners are surveyed and we consistently point to the need for better public education. We know that MS spends very little, one of the lowest of all states, on per child public education. As a business owner, I know the mantra all too well of “you get what you pay for.” It’s an old standard saying because it is TRUE. Plain and simple, MS needs to start with better funding of public education, THEN, we can talk about choice. Until then, let’s get back to basics, which is what we business owners do.

  2. The fact that Callen and Empower MS consider public education to be an Entitlement tells you all you need to know.

    The School Choice vouchers that they’re lobbying for actually are an Entitlement–they do not level the playing field. The vouchers do not provide for transportation to/from school and do not cover the cost of tuition at the vast majority of private schools, making them useless for many Mississippi families.

Leave a Reply